Distinguishing Trust from Risk: An Anatomy of the Investment Game

Daniel Houser, D. Schunk, J. Winter
{"title":"Distinguishing Trust from Risk: An Anatomy of the Investment Game","authors":"Daniel Houser, D. Schunk, J. Winter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1489785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of trust in promoting economic activity and societal development has received considerable academic attention by social scientists. A popular way to measure trust at the individual level is the so-called “investment game” (Berg, Dickhaut, and McCabe, 1995). It has been widely noted, however, that risk attitudes can also affect decisions in this game, and thus in principle confound inferences about trust. We provide novel evidence shedding light on the role of risk attitudes for trusting decisions. To the best of our knowledge our data are the first rigorous evidence that (i) aggregate investment distributions differ significantly between trust and risk environments, and (ii) risk attitudes predict individual investment decisions in risk games but not in the corresponding trust games. Our results are convergent evidence that trust decisions are not tightly connected to a person’s risk attitudes, and they lend support to the “trust” interpretation of decisions in investment games.","PeriodicalId":113084,"journal":{"name":"Law & Prosociality eJournal","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"228","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Prosociality eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1489785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 228

Abstract

The role of trust in promoting economic activity and societal development has received considerable academic attention by social scientists. A popular way to measure trust at the individual level is the so-called “investment game” (Berg, Dickhaut, and McCabe, 1995). It has been widely noted, however, that risk attitudes can also affect decisions in this game, and thus in principle confound inferences about trust. We provide novel evidence shedding light on the role of risk attitudes for trusting decisions. To the best of our knowledge our data are the first rigorous evidence that (i) aggregate investment distributions differ significantly between trust and risk environments, and (ii) risk attitudes predict individual investment decisions in risk games but not in the corresponding trust games. Our results are convergent evidence that trust decisions are not tightly connected to a person’s risk attitudes, and they lend support to the “trust” interpretation of decisions in investment games.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区分信任与风险:投资博弈剖析
信任在促进经济活动和社会发展方面的作用受到社会科学家的广泛关注。在个人层面衡量信任的一种流行方法是所谓的“投资游戏”(Berg, Dickhaut, and McCabe, 1995)。然而,人们普遍注意到,风险态度也会影响这个游戏中的决策,因此原则上会混淆关于信任的推论。我们提供了新的证据,阐明了风险态度对信任决策的作用。据我们所知,我们的数据是第一个严谨的证据,证明(i)总投资分布在信任和风险环境之间存在显著差异,(ii)风险态度预测风险博弈中的个人投资决策,而不是相应的信任博弈。我们的研究结果证明,信任决策与一个人的风险态度并没有紧密联系,它们为投资游戏中决策的“信任”解释提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contagion of Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior Among Peers and the Role of Social Proximity Dimensions of Altruism: Do Evaluations of Prosocial Behavior Track Social Good or Personal Sacrifice? How Do Prisoners Solve Their Dilemma? An Experiment Behavioral Approach to Law: An Emerging Discipline What Does 'Clean' Really Mean? The Implicit Framing of Decontextualized Experiments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1