Deductibility of VAT on expenses incurred for the purchase of shares by a holding: a helpful French Supreme Court decision

Odile Courjon
{"title":"Deductibility of VAT on expenses incurred for the purchase of shares by a holding: a helpful French Supreme Court decision","authors":"Odile Courjon","doi":"10.5235/20488432.3.1.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In June 2013, the French Supreme Court issued a favourable decision concerning VAT deduction on expenses incurred in the course of a share purchase transaction. This article revisits the context of this decision and explains the case. L’Air Liquide SA is an active French holding company involved in industrial gas production and also in the management of its subsidiaries. L’Air Liquide SA had planned to purchase 11 subsidiaries of the Messer Group, a competitor of Air Liquide SA. To achieve this purchase, L’Air Liquide SA hired the services of a French bank and an audit firm. After the preliminary due diligence work, however, L’Air Liquide SA decided not to purchase five of the targeted subsidiaries. L’Air Liquide SA finally concluded a sale purchase agreement with the Messer Group for the six remaining subsidiaries, which also provided a substitution clause to the benefit of one of its subsidiaries: Air Liquide International, an old sub-holding entity which mainly owned non-French subsidiaries. Ultimately, relying on this clause, it was Air Liquide International that acquired the subsidiaries from the Messer Group. The French tax administration denied the deductibility of VAT on the costs incurred for the purchase of the subsidiaries by L’Air Liquide SA. The French tax administration argued that L’Air Liquide SA was not the effective beneficiary of the transactions as it never intended to buy the shares itself. Thus, it had no economic purpose for incurring the costs involved in the deal.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.3.1.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In June 2013, the French Supreme Court issued a favourable decision concerning VAT deduction on expenses incurred in the course of a share purchase transaction. This article revisits the context of this decision and explains the case. L’Air Liquide SA is an active French holding company involved in industrial gas production and also in the management of its subsidiaries. L’Air Liquide SA had planned to purchase 11 subsidiaries of the Messer Group, a competitor of Air Liquide SA. To achieve this purchase, L’Air Liquide SA hired the services of a French bank and an audit firm. After the preliminary due diligence work, however, L’Air Liquide SA decided not to purchase five of the targeted subsidiaries. L’Air Liquide SA finally concluded a sale purchase agreement with the Messer Group for the six remaining subsidiaries, which also provided a substitution clause to the benefit of one of its subsidiaries: Air Liquide International, an old sub-holding entity which mainly owned non-French subsidiaries. Ultimately, relying on this clause, it was Air Liquide International that acquired the subsidiaries from the Messer Group. The French tax administration denied the deductibility of VAT on the costs incurred for the purchase of the subsidiaries by L’Air Liquide SA. The French tax administration argued that L’Air Liquide SA was not the effective beneficiary of the transactions as it never intended to buy the shares itself. Thus, it had no economic purpose for incurring the costs involved in the deal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过控股购买股票产生的费用扣除增值税:法国最高法院的一项有益裁决
2013年6月,法国最高法院就股票购买交易过程中产生的费用的增值税扣除作出了有利的裁决。本文将重新审视这一决定的背景,并解释这一案例。法国液化空气集团是一家活跃的法国控股公司,主要从事工业气体生产和其子公司的管理。法国液化空气集团(L’Air Liquide SA)曾计划收购梅塞尔集团(Messer Group)的11家子公司。梅塞尔集团是法国液化空气集团的竞争对手。为了完成这次收购,法国液化空气集团聘请了一家法国银行和一家审计公司。然而,经过初步尽职调查后,法国液化空气集团决定不收购目标子公司中的5家。法国液化空气集团(L’Air Liquide SA)最终与梅塞尔集团(Messer Group)就剩余的六家子公司达成了一项买卖协议,该协议还提供了一项替代条款,以使其子公司之一:液化空气国际公司(Air Liquide International)受益,该公司是一家老牌子控股实体,主要拥有非法国子公司。最终,依靠这一条款,液化空气国际集团从梅塞尔集团手中收购了这些子公司。法国税务机关否认L’air Liquide SA购买子公司所产生的成本可以抵扣增值税。法国税务部门辩称,法国液化空气集团(L’air Liquide SA)并非这些交易的实际受益人,因为该公司本身从未打算购买这些股票。因此,它没有产生交易所涉及的成本的经济目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equality under State aid rules and VAT The direct and immediate link with specialised services contracts as a measure for the right to deduct input VAT and the uncertainty in European tax law VAT deduction and member state sovereignty: (still) a good idea? EU VAT at the dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution* VAT information asymmetries in the context of intra-EU trade in goods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1