From theory to action: developing and evaluating learning analytics for learning design

Korah J. Wiley, Y. Dimitriadis, Alison Bradford, Marcia C. Linn
{"title":"From theory to action: developing and evaluating learning analytics for learning design","authors":"Korah J. Wiley, Y. Dimitriadis, Alison Bradford, Marcia C. Linn","doi":"10.1145/3375462.3375540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effectiveness of using learning analytics for learning design primarily depends upon two concepts: grounding and alignment. This is the primary conjecture for the study described in this paper. In our design-based research study, we design, test, and evaluate teacher-facing learning analytics for an online inquiry science unit on global climate change. We design our learning analytics in accordance with a socioconstructivism-based pedagogical framework, called Knowledge Integration, and the principles of learning analytics Implementation Design. Our methodology for the design process draws upon the principle of the Orchestrating for Learning Analytics framework to engage stakeholders (i.e. teachers, researchers, and developers). The resulting learning analytics were aligned to unit activities that engaged students in key aspects of the knowledge integration process. They provided teachers with actionable insight into their students' understanding at critical junctures in the learning process. We demonstrate the efficacy of the learning analytics in supporting the optimization of the unit's learning design. We conclude by synthesizing the principles that guided our design process into a framework for developing and evaluating learning analytics for learning design.","PeriodicalId":355800,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

The effectiveness of using learning analytics for learning design primarily depends upon two concepts: grounding and alignment. This is the primary conjecture for the study described in this paper. In our design-based research study, we design, test, and evaluate teacher-facing learning analytics for an online inquiry science unit on global climate change. We design our learning analytics in accordance with a socioconstructivism-based pedagogical framework, called Knowledge Integration, and the principles of learning analytics Implementation Design. Our methodology for the design process draws upon the principle of the Orchestrating for Learning Analytics framework to engage stakeholders (i.e. teachers, researchers, and developers). The resulting learning analytics were aligned to unit activities that engaged students in key aspects of the knowledge integration process. They provided teachers with actionable insight into their students' understanding at critical junctures in the learning process. We demonstrate the efficacy of the learning analytics in supporting the optimization of the unit's learning design. We conclude by synthesizing the principles that guided our design process into a framework for developing and evaluating learning analytics for learning design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从理论到行动:为学习设计开发和评估学习分析
在学习设计中使用学习分析的有效性主要取决于两个概念:基础和对齐。这是本文所述研究的主要猜想。在我们基于设计的研究性学习中,我们为全球气候变化的在线探究科学单元设计、测试和评估面向教师的学习分析。我们根据基于社会建构主义的教学框架(称为知识整合)和学习分析实施设计原则来设计我们的学习分析。我们的设计过程方法借鉴了编排学习分析框架的原则,以吸引利益相关者(即教师,研究人员和开发人员)。由此产生的学习分析与单元活动相一致,这些活动使学生参与到知识整合过程的关键方面。他们在学习过程的关键时刻为教师提供了可操作的洞察学生的理解。我们证明了学习分析在支持单元学习设计优化方面的功效。最后,我们将指导我们设计过程的原则综合到一个框架中,用于开发和评估学习设计的学习分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How working memory capacity limits success in self-directed learning: a cognitive model of search and concept formation Quantifying data sensitivity: precise demonstration of care when building student prediction models Towards automated analysis of cognitive presence in MOOC discussions: a manual classification study Towards automatic cross-language classification of cognitive presence in online discussions What college students say, and what they do: aligning self-regulated learning theory with behavioral logs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1