Geometric average-based fast-converging proportional fair scheduling for LTE downlink transmissions

Mahir Ayhan, Luca Zappaterra, Hyeong-Ah Choi
{"title":"Geometric average-based fast-converging proportional fair scheduling for LTE downlink transmissions","authors":"Mahir Ayhan, Luca Zappaterra, Hyeong-Ah Choi","doi":"10.1109/IWSLS.2016.7801574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long Term Evolution (LTE) wireless communication system has adopted Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) technology to provide downlink transmissions to multiple User Equipment (UE) in a single transmission time interval. In OFDMA, UEs provide quantized channel quality information, called channel quality indicator (CQI), to the base station. CQI feedback is then used at the base station to choose which UE to be scheduled and which modulation and coding scheme (MCS) for the selected UE to be used in downlink transmissions. Each UE sends averaged CQI over all subcarriers instead of sending the CQI of each subcarrier to minimize feedback overhead. As a result, only one MCS is applied at the base station for multiple subcarriers intended for the same UE. This can cause significant throughput degradation, especially in low SNR regions in which the actual CQI of each subcarrier may vary significantly. Our experimental results show that the two well-known scheduling algorithms, namely Best CQI and Proportional Fair Scheduling (PFS), fail to provide spectrum efficiency and/or fairness among UEs. These algorithms tend to provide a large fraction of bandwidth to a single UE; hence, the UE fails to demodulate transmitted data to which only one modulation scheme was applied. In this paper, we propose a novel scheduling algorithm that achieves better throughput performance, while providing more fairness among UEs than existing solutions in both high and low SNR environments. The proposed algorithm improves cell throughput by 66% over the PFS when UEs experience various SNR values. When UEs undergo similar SNR values, the system throughput can be improved by more than 120% over BestCQI and by almost 60% over PFS. Extensive simulations validate that our proposed solution also significantly enhance Block Error ratio (BLER) in addition to network throughput and fairness.","PeriodicalId":138269,"journal":{"name":"2016 1st International Workshop on Link- and System Level Simulations (IWSLS)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 1st International Workshop on Link- and System Level Simulations (IWSLS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSLS.2016.7801574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Long Term Evolution (LTE) wireless communication system has adopted Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) technology to provide downlink transmissions to multiple User Equipment (UE) in a single transmission time interval. In OFDMA, UEs provide quantized channel quality information, called channel quality indicator (CQI), to the base station. CQI feedback is then used at the base station to choose which UE to be scheduled and which modulation and coding scheme (MCS) for the selected UE to be used in downlink transmissions. Each UE sends averaged CQI over all subcarriers instead of sending the CQI of each subcarrier to minimize feedback overhead. As a result, only one MCS is applied at the base station for multiple subcarriers intended for the same UE. This can cause significant throughput degradation, especially in low SNR regions in which the actual CQI of each subcarrier may vary significantly. Our experimental results show that the two well-known scheduling algorithms, namely Best CQI and Proportional Fair Scheduling (PFS), fail to provide spectrum efficiency and/or fairness among UEs. These algorithms tend to provide a large fraction of bandwidth to a single UE; hence, the UE fails to demodulate transmitted data to which only one modulation scheme was applied. In this paper, we propose a novel scheduling algorithm that achieves better throughput performance, while providing more fairness among UEs than existing solutions in both high and low SNR environments. The proposed algorithm improves cell throughput by 66% over the PFS when UEs experience various SNR values. When UEs undergo similar SNR values, the system throughput can be improved by more than 120% over BestCQI and by almost 60% over PFS. Extensive simulations validate that our proposed solution also significantly enhance Block Error ratio (BLER) in addition to network throughput and fairness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于几何平均的LTE下行传输快速收敛比例公平调度
长期演进(LTE)无线通信系统采用正交频分多址(OFDMA)技术,在单一传输时间间隔内向多个用户设备(UE)提供下行传输。在OFDMA中,终端向基站提供量化的信道质量信息,称为信道质量指示器(CQI)。然后在基站中使用CQI反馈来选择要调度的终端,以及在下行链路传输中使用所选终端的调制和编码方案(MCS)。每个UE发送所有子载波的平均CQI,而不是发送每个子载波的CQI,以最小化反馈开销。因此,同一个终端的多个子载波在基站上只应用一个MCS。这可能导致显著的吞吐量下降,特别是在低信噪比区域,其中每个子载波的实际CQI可能变化很大。我们的实验结果表明,两种著名的调度算法,即最佳CQI和比例公平调度(PFS),不能提供频谱效率和/或公平性。这些算法倾向于为单个UE提供很大一部分带宽;因此,UE无法对仅应用一种调制方案的传输数据进行解调。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的调度算法,该算法在高信噪比和低信噪比环境中实现了更好的吞吐量性能,同时在ue之间提供了比现有解决方案更多的公平性。当ue经历不同的信噪比值时,所提出的算法比PFS提高了66%的小区吞吐量。当ue经历相似的信噪比值时,系统吞吐量可以比BestCQI提高120%以上,比PFS提高近60%。大量的仿真验证了我们提出的解决方案除了网络吞吐量和公平性之外,还显着提高了块错误率(BLER)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling unicast device-to-device communications with simuLTE Modeling X2 backhauling for LTE-advanced and assessing its effect on CoMP coordinated scheduling Dynamic scheduling in system-level simulations for multi-hop D2D communications in LTE networks Link-level simulator for WLAN networks Four-dimensional network simulation of direct air to ground LTE networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1