{"title":"SpecAugment Impact on Automatic Speaker Verification System","authors":"M. Faisal, S. Suyanto","doi":"10.1109/ISRITI48646.2019.9034603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An automatic speaker verification (ASV) is one of the challenging problem in speech processing since there are so many models of machine learnings those capable of synthesizing a fake speech from a given text. This paper discusses the impact of SpecAugment to methods such as Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Some experiments on a speech dataset sampled from the ASVSpoof2019, which is specially made to tackle the threat of spoofing, show that DNNs produces an Equal Error Rate (EER) of 18.1% that is better than the GMM system with EER of 19.0%. And after combining with a traditional augmentation technique, the DNNs also gives a better EER of 15.3% than GMM with EER of 15.7%.","PeriodicalId":367363,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRITI48646.2019.9034603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Abstract
An automatic speaker verification (ASV) is one of the challenging problem in speech processing since there are so many models of machine learnings those capable of synthesizing a fake speech from a given text. This paper discusses the impact of SpecAugment to methods such as Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Some experiments on a speech dataset sampled from the ASVSpoof2019, which is specially made to tackle the threat of spoofing, show that DNNs produces an Equal Error Rate (EER) of 18.1% that is better than the GMM system with EER of 19.0%. And after combining with a traditional augmentation technique, the DNNs also gives a better EER of 15.3% than GMM with EER of 15.7%.