Rating of authors

V. Stehlíková, M. Urban, Ondřej Netvich
{"title":"Rating of authors","authors":"V. Stehlíková, M. Urban, Ondřej Netvich","doi":"10.14311/GI.15.2.0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a vast theoretical background for evaluation of scientific works and there are a lot of ways how to, if possible, objectively evaluate the significance and quality of individual theses, authors and researches. Various evaluation elements are more or less objective in different branches of research and it is necessary to consider suitability of their use and \"justness\" of the final comparison. Then it depends on each metric, how it uses these and other parameters and how many iterations it logs. Elementary ways of calculation of these indicators of quality, their properties and scientific power evaluation of an researcher are briefly explained in this article.","PeriodicalId":436054,"journal":{"name":"Geoinformatics FCE CTU","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoinformatics FCE CTU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14311/GI.15.2.0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is a vast theoretical background for evaluation of scientific works and there are a lot of ways how to, if possible, objectively evaluate the significance and quality of individual theses, authors and researches. Various evaluation elements are more or less objective in different branches of research and it is necessary to consider suitability of their use and "justness" of the final comparison. Then it depends on each metric, how it uses these and other parameters and how many iterations it logs. Elementary ways of calculation of these indicators of quality, their properties and scientific power evaluation of an researcher are briefly explained in this article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作者评分
科学著作的评价有着广泛的理论背景,如何尽可能客观地评价个别论文、作者和研究的意义和质量也有很多方法。在不同的研究分支中,各种评价要素或多或少是客观的,需要考虑其使用的适宜性和最终比较的“公正性”。然后它取决于每个指标,它如何使用这些参数和其他参数,以及它记录了多少次迭代。本文简要介绍了这些质量指标的基本计算方法、性质和科研人员的科学能力评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Alternative Choice in Heighting Plotting the map projection graticule involving discontinuities based on combined sampling Implication of Human Induced Activities on Ecotourism in Ikogosi Warm Spring Centre, Ekiti State, Southern western, Nigeria Accurate Measurement of the Riverbed Model for Deformation Analysis using Laser Scanning Technology Geodetic work at the archaeological site Tell el-Retaba
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1