Cripping the "Crack Baby" Epidemic: A Feminist Disability Genealogy of Welfare Reform

Lezlie Frye
{"title":"Cripping the \"Crack Baby\" Epidemic: A Feminist Disability Genealogy of Welfare Reform","authors":"Lezlie Frye","doi":"10.1353/ff.2022.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article revisits the \"crack baby epidemic\" of the 1980s and 90s through a critical disability lens. It examines how newly available rights-based discourses of disability underwrote the overlapping figures of the \"crack baby,\" the \"crack mother,\" and the \"welfare queen\" in ways that called up historical narratives of the Black family as fundamentally impaired. This racialization of disability was contrasted by a seemingly incommensurate process, wherein disability was increasingly incorporated into the national tableau of multicultural difference. I argue that in a moment marked by the institutionalization of multicultural neoliberalism, disability held the suggestive power of antiracism, which productively enabled the racial violence of state neglect. It thus presents a feminist disability genealogy that takes account of the history of welfare reform through and against the contemporaneous history of US disability rights and its crucial legislative victories. This draws attention to the racialized and gendered subjects hailed in different relation to the state: the \"crack baby\" vs. the special needs Child, the \"welfare queen\" versus the independent, productive disabled citizen. It also highlights the division between deserving and undeserving forms of dependency consolidated in welfare legislation in the 1990s. Ultimately refusing the perpetuation of anti-Black racism through deployments of disability, I perform a coalitional reading that makes feminist sense of the historical relationship between disability and anti-Blackness in this era.","PeriodicalId":190295,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Formations","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Formations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2022.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article revisits the "crack baby epidemic" of the 1980s and 90s through a critical disability lens. It examines how newly available rights-based discourses of disability underwrote the overlapping figures of the "crack baby," the "crack mother," and the "welfare queen" in ways that called up historical narratives of the Black family as fundamentally impaired. This racialization of disability was contrasted by a seemingly incommensurate process, wherein disability was increasingly incorporated into the national tableau of multicultural difference. I argue that in a moment marked by the institutionalization of multicultural neoliberalism, disability held the suggestive power of antiracism, which productively enabled the racial violence of state neglect. It thus presents a feminist disability genealogy that takes account of the history of welfare reform through and against the contemporaneous history of US disability rights and its crucial legislative victories. This draws attention to the racialized and gendered subjects hailed in different relation to the state: the "crack baby" vs. the special needs Child, the "welfare queen" versus the independent, productive disabled citizen. It also highlights the division between deserving and undeserving forms of dependency consolidated in welfare legislation in the 1990s. Ultimately refusing the perpetuation of anti-Black racism through deployments of disability, I perform a coalitional reading that makes feminist sense of the historical relationship between disability and anti-Blackness in this era.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打击“吸毒婴儿”流行病:福利改革的女权主义残疾谱系
摘要:本文通过批判性的残疾视角,重新审视了上世纪八九十年代的“可卡因婴儿流行病”。它考察了新近出现的以权利为基础的关于残疾的话语是如何以一种唤起黑人家庭从根本上受损的历史叙述的方式,为“吸毒婴儿”、“吸毒母亲”和“福利女王”这些重叠的人物提供担保的。残疾的种族化与一个看似不相称的过程形成对比,在这个过程中,残疾日益被纳入多元文化差异的国家舞台。我认为,在一个以多元文化新自由主义制度化为标志的时刻,残疾拥有反种族主义的暗示性力量,这有效地使国家忽视的种族暴力成为可能。因此,它呈现了一个女权主义的残疾谱系,考虑到福利改革的历史,通过和反对美国残疾人权利的同时期历史及其重要的立法胜利。这引起了人们对种族化和性别化的主体与国家的不同关系的关注:“吸毒婴儿”与特殊需要的孩子,“福利女王”与独立,有生产力的残疾公民。它还强调了在20世纪90年代福利立法中巩固的应得和不应得的依赖形式之间的分歧。最终,我拒绝通过残疾的部署来延续反黑人种族主义,我进行了一场联合阅读,让女权主义者理解这个时代残疾和反黑人之间的历史关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
When Modesty Meets Aesthetic Labor: Islamic Modesty as Antithetical to Muslimah Social Media Influencers' Aesthetic Labor Editorial Introduction: Transnational Feminist Movement(s), Solidarities, and Analyses Mamá Osa in the Mountains: African Ascendientes' Embodiments of Fugitivity and Freedom in the Americas "It Came, Over and Over, Down to This: What Made Someone a Mother?": A Reproductive Justice Analysis of Little Fires Everywhere Reluctant Belonging: Tudung (Headscarf), Communalism, and Muslim Politics in Urban Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1