Introduction: Pragmatism Then and Now

M. Dickstein
{"title":"Introduction: Pragmatism Then and Now","authors":"M. Dickstein","doi":"10.1215/9780822382522-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The revival of pragmatism has excited enormous interest and controversy in the intellectual community over the past two decades. By the middle of the twentieth century, pragmatism was widely considered a naively optimistic residue ofan earlier liberalism, discredited by the Depression and the horrors of the war, and virtually driven from philosophy departments by the reigning school of analytic philosophy. Now once again it is recognized not only as the most distinctive American contribution to philosophy but as a new way of approaching old problems in a number of fields. As the present volume shows, pragmatism has become a key point of reference around which contemporary debates in social thought, law, and literary theory as well as philosophy have been unfolded. It has appealed to philosophers moving beyond analytic philosophy, European theorists looking for an alternative to Marxism, and postmodernists seeking native roots for their critique of absolutes and universals. The revival has not only drawn new attention to the original pragmatists but altered our view of writers as different as Emerson and Frost, Nietzsche and Wittgenstein, Santayana and Stevens, Du Bois and Ellison, all ofwhom have been reconsidered in the light of a broader conception of pragmatist thinking. Pragmatism as a branch of philosophy is exactly a hundred years old. The term was first brought forward by William James in a lecture in Berkeley in 1898, published as \"Philosophical Conceptions and Practical Results.\" In developing pragmatism as a critique ofabstractions and absolutes and as a philosophy oriented toward practice and action, James insisted that he was only building on thoughts developed by his friend Charles Sanders Peirce in Cambridge more than twenty years earlier. But the cantankerous Peirce was far from pleased with what James did with his ideas. Pragmatism's early years were as filled with controversy as its recent career. James plunged into the fray with his usual zest, and the lectures published as Pragmatism in 1907 became one of his most widely read","PeriodicalId":299767,"journal":{"name":"The Revival of Pragmatism","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Revival of Pragmatism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822382522-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The revival of pragmatism has excited enormous interest and controversy in the intellectual community over the past two decades. By the middle of the twentieth century, pragmatism was widely considered a naively optimistic residue ofan earlier liberalism, discredited by the Depression and the horrors of the war, and virtually driven from philosophy departments by the reigning school of analytic philosophy. Now once again it is recognized not only as the most distinctive American contribution to philosophy but as a new way of approaching old problems in a number of fields. As the present volume shows, pragmatism has become a key point of reference around which contemporary debates in social thought, law, and literary theory as well as philosophy have been unfolded. It has appealed to philosophers moving beyond analytic philosophy, European theorists looking for an alternative to Marxism, and postmodernists seeking native roots for their critique of absolutes and universals. The revival has not only drawn new attention to the original pragmatists but altered our view of writers as different as Emerson and Frost, Nietzsche and Wittgenstein, Santayana and Stevens, Du Bois and Ellison, all ofwhom have been reconsidered in the light of a broader conception of pragmatist thinking. Pragmatism as a branch of philosophy is exactly a hundred years old. The term was first brought forward by William James in a lecture in Berkeley in 1898, published as "Philosophical Conceptions and Practical Results." In developing pragmatism as a critique ofabstractions and absolutes and as a philosophy oriented toward practice and action, James insisted that he was only building on thoughts developed by his friend Charles Sanders Peirce in Cambridge more than twenty years earlier. But the cantankerous Peirce was far from pleased with what James did with his ideas. Pragmatism's early years were as filled with controversy as its recent career. James plunged into the fray with his usual zest, and the lectures published as Pragmatism in 1907 became one of his most widely read
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引言:过去和现在的实用主义
过去二十年来,实用主义的复兴在知识界引起了极大的兴趣和争议。到20世纪中叶,实用主义被广泛认为是早期自由主义的天真乐观的残余,由于大萧条和战争的恐怖而名誉扫地,实际上被占统治地位的分析哲学学派从哲学系赶了出去。现在,它再次被认为不仅是美国对哲学最独特的贡献,而且是在许多领域解决老问题的新方法。正如本卷所示,实用主义已经成为一个关键的参考点,在社会思想,法律,文学理论以及哲学的当代辩论已经展开。它吸引了超越分析哲学的哲学家,寻找马克思主义替代品的欧洲理论家,以及为他们对绝对和普遍的批判寻找本土根源的后现代主义者。这种复兴不仅使人们重新注意到最初的实用主义作家,而且改变了我们对作家的看法,这些作家与爱默生和弗罗斯特、尼采和维特根斯坦、桑塔亚那和史蒂文斯、杜波依斯和埃里森等作家截然不同,他们都在更广泛的实用主义思想概念的基础上得到了重新审视。实用主义作为哲学的一个分支已经有整整一百年的历史了。1898年,威廉·詹姆斯(William James)在伯克利的一次演讲中首次提出了这个术语,并以《哲学概念和实践结果》(Philosophical concepts and Practical Results)为名发表。在将实用主义发展为一种对抽象和绝对的批判,以及一种以实践和行动为导向的哲学时,詹姆斯坚持认为,他只是建立在他的朋友查尔斯·桑德斯·皮尔斯20多年前在剑桥提出的思想基础之上。但是脾气暴躁的皮尔斯对詹姆斯的想法很不满意。实用主义的早期和它最近的职业生涯一样充满了争议。詹姆斯以他一贯的热情投入到争论中,1907年出版的《实用主义》成为他最广为阅读的演讲之一
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pragmatists and Poets: A Response to Richard Poirier The Moral Impulse The Inspiration of Pragmatism: Some Personal Remarks Acknowledgments Religion and the Recent Revival of Pragmatism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1