The Rise of Money and Class Society: The Contributions of John F. Henry

A. Semenova, L. Randall Wray
{"title":"The Rise of Money and Class Society: The Contributions of John F. Henry","authors":"A. Semenova, L. Randall Wray","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2563700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the rise of money and class society in ancient Greece, drawing historical and theoretical parallels to the case of ancient Egypt. In doing so, the paper examines the historical applicability of the chartalist and metallist theories of money. It will be shown that the origins and the evolution of money were closely intertwined with the rise and consolidation of class society and inequality. Money, class society, and inequality came into being simultaneously, so it seems, mutually reinforcing the development of one another. Rather than a medium of exchange in commerce, money emerged as an \"egalitarian token\" at the time when the substance of social relations was undergoing a fundamental transformation from egalitarian to class societies. In this context, money served to preserve the faA§ade of social and economic harmony and equality, while inequality was growing and solidifying. Rather than \"invented\" by private traders, money was first issued by ancient Greek states and proto-states as they aimed to establish and consolidate their political and economic power. Rather than a medium of exchange in commerce, money first served as a \"means of recompense\" administered by the Greek city-states as they strived to implement the civic conception of social justice. While the origins of money are to be found in the origins of inequality, a well-functioning democratic society has the power to subvert the inequality-inducing characteristic of money via the use of money for public purpose, following the principles of Modern Money Theory (MMT). When used according to the principles of MMT, the inequality-inducing characteristic of money could be undermined, while the current trends in rising income and wealth disparities could be contained and reversed.","PeriodicalId":305946,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Economic Systems (Sub-Topic)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Economic Systems (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2563700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper explores the rise of money and class society in ancient Greece, drawing historical and theoretical parallels to the case of ancient Egypt. In doing so, the paper examines the historical applicability of the chartalist and metallist theories of money. It will be shown that the origins and the evolution of money were closely intertwined with the rise and consolidation of class society and inequality. Money, class society, and inequality came into being simultaneously, so it seems, mutually reinforcing the development of one another. Rather than a medium of exchange in commerce, money emerged as an "egalitarian token" at the time when the substance of social relations was undergoing a fundamental transformation from egalitarian to class societies. In this context, money served to preserve the faA§ade of social and economic harmony and equality, while inequality was growing and solidifying. Rather than "invented" by private traders, money was first issued by ancient Greek states and proto-states as they aimed to establish and consolidate their political and economic power. Rather than a medium of exchange in commerce, money first served as a "means of recompense" administered by the Greek city-states as they strived to implement the civic conception of social justice. While the origins of money are to be found in the origins of inequality, a well-functioning democratic society has the power to subvert the inequality-inducing characteristic of money via the use of money for public purpose, following the principles of Modern Money Theory (MMT). When used according to the principles of MMT, the inequality-inducing characteristic of money could be undermined, while the current trends in rising income and wealth disparities could be contained and reversed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金钱与阶级社会的兴起:约翰·f·亨利的贡献
本文探讨了古希腊的金钱和阶级社会的兴起,并在历史和理论上与古埃及的情况进行了比较。在此过程中,本文考察了图表主义和金属主义货币理论的历史适用性。它将表明,货币的起源和演变与阶级社会和不平等的兴起和巩固密切相关。金钱、阶级社会和不平等似乎是同时产生的,它们相互促进着彼此的发展。当社会关系的实质正在经历从平等主义社会到阶级社会的根本转变时,货币不再是商业交易的媒介,而是作为一种“平等主义的象征”出现的。在这种情况下,货币起到了维护社会经济和谐与平等的作用,而不平等却在不断扩大和巩固。货币不是由私人商人“发明”的,而是由古希腊国家和原始国家首先发行的,目的是建立和巩固他们的政治和经济权力。与其说货币是商业交易的媒介,倒不如说货币最初是希腊城邦在努力实现社会正义的公民概念时所管理的“补偿手段”。虽然货币的起源是在不平等的起源中找到的,但一个运作良好的民主社会有能力通过将货币用于公共目的,遵循现代货币理论(MMT)的原则,颠覆货币引起不平等的特征。如果按照MMT的原则使用货币,就可以削弱货币引起不平等的特性,同时可以遏制和扭转目前收入和财富差距扩大的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Implementation of an Adjusted Relative Strength Index Model in the Foreign Currency and Energy Markets of Emerging and Developed Economies Commerce, Religion, and the Rule of Law A Financial Macro-Network Approach to Climate Policy Evaluation Cooperatives As Hybrid Approach to Pull Off Sustainable Development and Livelihoods: An Analytical Review The National Credit Act’s Remedies for Reckless Credit in the Mortgage Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1