Open Innovation from Chesbrough to now: where do we stand today?: An exploratory review of Open Innovation Model

Rime Ettabaa, D. Bouami, S. Elfezazi
{"title":"Open Innovation from Chesbrough to now: where do we stand today?: An exploratory review of Open Innovation Model","authors":"Rime Ettabaa, D. Bouami, S. Elfezazi","doi":"10.1109/LOGISTIQUA.2019.8907253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open Innovation (OI) has become one of the most popular concepts in Industry and Academia. Over the past decade, an outstanding body of knowledge (BOK) has been accumulated about OI and nowadays, it is one of the most reviewed topic in the field of “Innovation Management”. The concept has swiftly progressed from a restricted circle of high-tech practitioners, to a widely discussed and implemented concept in different industries. The community of researchers have made it an established research field. The primary goal of this article is to explore the concept recent developments in light of new research findings and industry best practices. Thus, we start by analyzing the model of OI, commonly contrasted to “Closed Model”, then we attempt to categorize OI and to analyze strengths and limitations of each class type. Lastly, we address the crucial issue of OI processes, we attempt to assess recent models, to discuss implementation issues and to select best practices. This paper aims to build on past and present studies to provide future directions, also, limitations are presented to point out issues that remain insufficiently documented and require further academic researches. The main theories and authors (practitioners and academics) who deal with OI have been highlighted.","PeriodicalId":435919,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Colloquium on Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Colloquium on Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LOGISTIQUA.2019.8907253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Open Innovation (OI) has become one of the most popular concepts in Industry and Academia. Over the past decade, an outstanding body of knowledge (BOK) has been accumulated about OI and nowadays, it is one of the most reviewed topic in the field of “Innovation Management”. The concept has swiftly progressed from a restricted circle of high-tech practitioners, to a widely discussed and implemented concept in different industries. The community of researchers have made it an established research field. The primary goal of this article is to explore the concept recent developments in light of new research findings and industry best practices. Thus, we start by analyzing the model of OI, commonly contrasted to “Closed Model”, then we attempt to categorize OI and to analyze strengths and limitations of each class type. Lastly, we address the crucial issue of OI processes, we attempt to assess recent models, to discuss implementation issues and to select best practices. This paper aims to build on past and present studies to provide future directions, also, limitations are presented to point out issues that remain insufficiently documented and require further academic researches. The main theories and authors (practitioners and academics) who deal with OI have been highlighted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从Chesbrough到现在的开放式创新:我们今天站在哪里?:开放式创新模式的探索性回顾
开放式创新(Open Innovation, OI)已经成为工业界和学术界最流行的概念之一。在过去的十年中,关于OI积累了一个杰出的知识体系(BOK),如今它是“创新管理”领域中最受关注的话题之一。这个概念已经从一个有限的高科技从业者圈子迅速发展成为一个在不同行业广泛讨论和实施的概念。研究人员社区已经使它成为一个既定的研究领域。本文的主要目标是根据新的研究成果和行业最佳实践来探索概念的最新发展。因此,我们首先分析OI的模型(通常与“封闭模型”形成对比),然后尝试对OI进行分类,并分析每种类类型的优势和局限性。最后,我们讨论了OI过程的关键问题,我们试图评估最近的模型,讨论实现问题并选择最佳实践。本文旨在建立在过去和现在的研究,以提供未来的方向,也提出了局限性,指出的问题,仍然没有充分的文献,需要进一步的学术研究。重点介绍了治疗成骨不全的主要理论和作者(从业人员和学者)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to go from insourcing to outsourcing: A conceptualized and illustrative framework of the transient phase Home (Health)-Care Routing and Scheduling Problem Products exchange in a multi-level distribution network A Strategic Framework for Multi-Echelon Inventory System Selection The utility of Lean Six Sigma(LSS) in the Supply Chain agro-industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1