Data normalisation techniques in decision making: case study with TOPSIS method

Nazanin Vafaei, Rita Almeida Ribeiro, L. Camarinha-Matos
{"title":"Data normalisation techniques in decision making: case study with TOPSIS method","authors":"Nazanin Vafaei, Rita Almeida Ribeiro, L. Camarinha-Matos","doi":"10.1504/IJIDS.2018.090667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data normalisation is essential for decision-making methods because data has to be numerical and comparable to be aggregated into a single score per alternative. In multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), normalisation must convert criteria values into a common scale, thus, enabling rating and ranking of alternatives. Therefore, it is a challenge to select a suitable normalisation technique to represent an appropriate mapping from source data to a common scale. There are some attempts in the literature to address the subject of normalisation, but it is still an open question which technique is more appropriate for any MCDM method. Our research contribution is an assessment approach for evaluating normalisation techniques. Here, we focus on six well-known normalisation techniques and on TOPSIS method. The proposed assessment process provides a more robust evaluation and selection of the best normalisation technique for usage in TOPSIS.","PeriodicalId":303039,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci.","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIDS.2018.090667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

Data normalisation is essential for decision-making methods because data has to be numerical and comparable to be aggregated into a single score per alternative. In multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), normalisation must convert criteria values into a common scale, thus, enabling rating and ranking of alternatives. Therefore, it is a challenge to select a suitable normalisation technique to represent an appropriate mapping from source data to a common scale. There are some attempts in the literature to address the subject of normalisation, but it is still an open question which technique is more appropriate for any MCDM method. Our research contribution is an assessment approach for evaluating normalisation techniques. Here, we focus on six well-known normalisation techniques and on TOPSIS method. The proposed assessment process provides a more robust evaluation and selection of the best normalisation technique for usage in TOPSIS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决策中的数据归一化技术:TOPSIS方法的案例研究
数据规范化对于决策方法至关重要,因为数据必须是数字的,并且可以比较,以便将每个选项汇总为单个分数。在多标准决策(MCDM)中,规范化必须将标准值转换为公共尺度,从而实现对备选方案的评级和排序。因此,选择一种合适的规范化技术来表示从源数据到公共尺度的适当映射是一项挑战。在文献中有一些尝试来解决正常化的问题,但它仍然是一个悬而未决的问题,哪种技术更适合任何MCDM方法。我们的研究贡献是评估归一化技术的评估方法。在这里,我们重点介绍了六种众所周知的归一化技术和TOPSIS方法。提出的评估过程为TOPSIS中使用的最佳规范化技术提供了更稳健的评估和选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the relationship between sustainability and software performance Health information exchange adoption: influences of public insurance programs Evaluation of risk causing factors for the incidence of neck and shoulder pain in adolescents using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process Technical debt reduction using epsilon-Nash equilibrium for the perturbed software refactor game model Performance evaluation of arc welding processes for the manufacturing of pressure vessel using novel hybrid MCDM technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1