Incorporating Equity Into Maternal Telehealth

Sabrina Movitz, R. Mayer, Alison Dingwall
{"title":"Incorporating Equity Into Maternal Telehealth","authors":"Sabrina Movitz, R. Mayer, Alison Dingwall","doi":"10.52504/001c.37490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The US maternal health crisis continues to disproportionately affect economically and socially marginalized pregnant and postpartum people. Meanwhile, telehealth has boomed in popularity due to the coronavirus pandemic and has been lauded as a potential tool to address certain social determinants of health (SDOHs) such as transportation and rurality. While telehealth shows promise for obstetric care delivery, more research is needed to assess accessibility and outcomes in diverse populations. This commentary outlines key areas for health care providers and researchers to advance maternal health equity through telehealth by addressing individual patient needs, investing in telehealth care delivery, using electronic health record data to identify demographic trends, and conducting equity-centered research focused on SDOHs for pregnant and postpartum people. While we use pregnant and postpartum people where possible here to recognize that not all pregnant people identify as women, we occasionally use women and maternal to reflect terminology used in federal, state, and local data.1 Additionally, we use the term telehealth in accordance with the definition by the US Department of Health and Human Services.2 *Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Public Release Case Number 22-1455. ©2022 The MITRE Corporation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED*","PeriodicalId":340325,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown Medical Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown Medical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52504/001c.37490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The US maternal health crisis continues to disproportionately affect economically and socially marginalized pregnant and postpartum people. Meanwhile, telehealth has boomed in popularity due to the coronavirus pandemic and has been lauded as a potential tool to address certain social determinants of health (SDOHs) such as transportation and rurality. While telehealth shows promise for obstetric care delivery, more research is needed to assess accessibility and outcomes in diverse populations. This commentary outlines key areas for health care providers and researchers to advance maternal health equity through telehealth by addressing individual patient needs, investing in telehealth care delivery, using electronic health record data to identify demographic trends, and conducting equity-centered research focused on SDOHs for pregnant and postpartum people. While we use pregnant and postpartum people where possible here to recognize that not all pregnant people identify as women, we occasionally use women and maternal to reflect terminology used in federal, state, and local data.1 Additionally, we use the term telehealth in accordance with the definition by the US Department of Health and Human Services.2 *Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Public Release Case Number 22-1455. ©2022 The MITRE Corporation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED*
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将公平纳入孕产妇远程保健
美国孕产妇健康危机继续不成比例地影响经济和社会边缘化的孕妇和产后人群。与此同时,由于冠状病毒大流行,远程医疗越来越受欢迎,并被誉为解决交通和农村等某些健康社会决定因素(SDOHs)的潜在工具。虽然远程保健显示了产科护理提供的前景,但需要更多的研究来评估不同人群的可及性和结果。本评论概述了卫生保健提供者和研究人员通过远程保健促进孕产妇保健公平的关键领域,包括解决患者的个人需求,投资于远程保健服务,使用电子健康记录数据确定人口趋势,以及开展以公平为中心的研究,重点关注孕妇和产后患者的sdos。虽然我们在这里尽可能使用孕妇和产后人员,以认识到并非所有孕妇都被认为是女性,但我们偶尔使用妇女和产妇来反映联邦、州和地方数据中使用的术语此外,我们根据美国卫生和人类服务部的定义使用术语远程医疗。2 *批准公开发布;无限的分布。公开发布案例号22-1455。©2022米特公司。版权所有*
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fostering open dialogue: Creating safe spaces for adolescents to discuss sexual health Review of minimally disruptive in vitro fertilization (IVF) approaches as a strategy for assisted human conception Does Propecia Cause More Harms than Good: Assessing Reproductive and Non-Reproductive Effects of Finasteride on Male Health Computer-mediated Communication and Healthcare Satisfaction among Middle-aged Men Living with or without HIV The Use of Stem Cells in Cardiac Pathologies: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1