{"title":"Medical audit and quality of care--a new English initiative.","authors":"D Macpherson, T Mann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1989 the Government in the UK announced a fundamental review of the financing of the National Health Service (NHS). Before the review, health authorities were responsible for both establishing need and providing services. Health Authorities are now allocated resources with which they commission services from managerially independent provider units. In the discussion that preceded the review concern was expressed about standards of clinical care given by doctors. It was recognised that these were professional issues which could not be directly addressed through the commissioning process, therefore within its NHS review proposals, the Government made clear its expectation that all doctors working in the NHS should participate in medical audit. This was defined as a systematic peer review of their work, including procedures used for diagnosis and treatment, the use of resources and the resulting outcome for patients. Managers should be provided with regular general reports of audit activity. These proposals for medical audit have been well received by the medical profession, who are now working closely with the Government to put them into practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"4 2","pages":"89-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 1989 the Government in the UK announced a fundamental review of the financing of the National Health Service (NHS). Before the review, health authorities were responsible for both establishing need and providing services. Health Authorities are now allocated resources with which they commission services from managerially independent provider units. In the discussion that preceded the review concern was expressed about standards of clinical care given by doctors. It was recognised that these were professional issues which could not be directly addressed through the commissioning process, therefore within its NHS review proposals, the Government made clear its expectation that all doctors working in the NHS should participate in medical audit. This was defined as a systematic peer review of their work, including procedures used for diagnosis and treatment, the use of resources and the resulting outcome for patients. Managers should be provided with regular general reports of audit activity. These proposals for medical audit have been well received by the medical profession, who are now working closely with the Government to put them into practice.