Gender and the Law

Mechthild E. Nagel
{"title":"Gender and the Law","authors":"Mechthild E. Nagel","doi":"10.22381/jrgs6220167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1.U.S. Exceptionalism and States of CaptivityThe United States government, business, media, etc., and my students have touted the virtues of its democratic values - it is the freest of all countries, and given that immigration continues unabated, it seems to be true! What would folks from the Global South give to win a coveted Green Card!However, this exceptionalist rhetoric has an ominous underside. No other country has engaged in wars of aggression at the level and intensity of the United States military machine since 1945. In fact, only seven years in its 200-year history have been relatively free from waging war. Hence no U.S. president can be considered a peace president!There's something very troubling about using bombs to \"free Afghan girls\" from the Taliban or free the Iraqi people from a dictator who the U.S. military and CIA propped up in the first place - women have had access to a variety of professional jobs in Iraq - so that invasion for \"freedom\" campaign couldn't have been executed under the humanitarian mantle of \"women's rights.\" As philosopher Angela Y. Davis has suggested in public talks, whenever George W. Bush exalted in \"freedom (and democracy)\" speechifying, one would do better by replacing \"freedom\" with \"capitalism\" - then his rhetoric actually made sense.Exceptionalism at any price. The Monroe Doctrine of the imperial 19th Century went eastwards to engulf the entire globe, especially in the wake of the Cold War and its hot expressions across Asia and Africa. So far a brief glimpse into the global, imperial expressions of an empire that considers itself democratic and decidedly export-friendly or zealous to enforce such democracy overseas.What does democracy mean within this nation-state, especially to all women and to men of color? In fact, as freed man Frederick Douglass exclaimed: What is the meaning of the 4th of July to the American slave? For our purposes, let us remember two important legal ramifications haunting the American republic: one - as presence, the other - as an absence.It is no secret that the United States confederacy was built on two pillars of violence: genocide of Indigenous peoples and enslavement of peoples captured from another continent. Yet, it basks in spreading \"freedom and democracy\" far and wide.Note the presence of one underexamined legal fact: the 13th amendment to the U.S. constitution captures the paradoxical nature of American Democracy: enslaved, indentured people are set free, but only if they don't commit a crime (U.S. Const. Amend. XIII)! Thus, the end of the U.S. Civil War in 1865 did not free enslaved Black people but instead ushered in statesanctioned enslavement. The state captures people and incarcerates them with such enthusiasm that to date the U.S. is the prison nation of the entire world. Having 5% of the world's share of population, it incarcerates 25% of the world's prisoners. And unsurprisingly, of the 2.3 million daily count of US prisoners, a majority of them are Black, even though the Black population stands at 12% of the general population, a distinct minority! Since the racist War on Drugs was propagated by the Nixon administration some 45 years ago, Black women have been alarmingly overincarcerated, even more so than Black men, and Black girls are overpoliced in the pre-kindergarten-toprison pipeline (Chesney-Lind, 2015; Morris, 2016). The upshot of the 13th amendment is that the U.S. is the only state in the world that legalizes slavery!The second legal fact concerns an absence: In 1982, an Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was defeated thanks to the vigorous activism of one conservative white woman, antifeminist Phyllis Schlafly, who enthusiastically supported the (white) woman's right to stay an unpaid homemaker (and sup- ported Donald Trump for president before her passing in September 2016). Her fear mongering regarding ERA was that an equal protection clause on the basis of gender rights would in slippery slope kind of way also extend rights to sexual minorities, and then they could marry, join the military and other ghastly practices. …","PeriodicalId":342957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Gender Studies","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Gender Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/jrgs6220167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1.U.S. Exceptionalism and States of CaptivityThe United States government, business, media, etc., and my students have touted the virtues of its democratic values - it is the freest of all countries, and given that immigration continues unabated, it seems to be true! What would folks from the Global South give to win a coveted Green Card!However, this exceptionalist rhetoric has an ominous underside. No other country has engaged in wars of aggression at the level and intensity of the United States military machine since 1945. In fact, only seven years in its 200-year history have been relatively free from waging war. Hence no U.S. president can be considered a peace president!There's something very troubling about using bombs to "free Afghan girls" from the Taliban or free the Iraqi people from a dictator who the U.S. military and CIA propped up in the first place - women have had access to a variety of professional jobs in Iraq - so that invasion for "freedom" campaign couldn't have been executed under the humanitarian mantle of "women's rights." As philosopher Angela Y. Davis has suggested in public talks, whenever George W. Bush exalted in "freedom (and democracy)" speechifying, one would do better by replacing "freedom" with "capitalism" - then his rhetoric actually made sense.Exceptionalism at any price. The Monroe Doctrine of the imperial 19th Century went eastwards to engulf the entire globe, especially in the wake of the Cold War and its hot expressions across Asia and Africa. So far a brief glimpse into the global, imperial expressions of an empire that considers itself democratic and decidedly export-friendly or zealous to enforce such democracy overseas.What does democracy mean within this nation-state, especially to all women and to men of color? In fact, as freed man Frederick Douglass exclaimed: What is the meaning of the 4th of July to the American slave? For our purposes, let us remember two important legal ramifications haunting the American republic: one - as presence, the other - as an absence.It is no secret that the United States confederacy was built on two pillars of violence: genocide of Indigenous peoples and enslavement of peoples captured from another continent. Yet, it basks in spreading "freedom and democracy" far and wide.Note the presence of one underexamined legal fact: the 13th amendment to the U.S. constitution captures the paradoxical nature of American Democracy: enslaved, indentured people are set free, but only if they don't commit a crime (U.S. Const. Amend. XIII)! Thus, the end of the U.S. Civil War in 1865 did not free enslaved Black people but instead ushered in statesanctioned enslavement. The state captures people and incarcerates them with such enthusiasm that to date the U.S. is the prison nation of the entire world. Having 5% of the world's share of population, it incarcerates 25% of the world's prisoners. And unsurprisingly, of the 2.3 million daily count of US prisoners, a majority of them are Black, even though the Black population stands at 12% of the general population, a distinct minority! Since the racist War on Drugs was propagated by the Nixon administration some 45 years ago, Black women have been alarmingly overincarcerated, even more so than Black men, and Black girls are overpoliced in the pre-kindergarten-toprison pipeline (Chesney-Lind, 2015; Morris, 2016). The upshot of the 13th amendment is that the U.S. is the only state in the world that legalizes slavery!The second legal fact concerns an absence: In 1982, an Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was defeated thanks to the vigorous activism of one conservative white woman, antifeminist Phyllis Schlafly, who enthusiastically supported the (white) woman's right to stay an unpaid homemaker (and sup- ported Donald Trump for president before her passing in September 2016). Her fear mongering regarding ERA was that an equal protection clause on the basis of gender rights would in slippery slope kind of way also extend rights to sexual minorities, and then they could marry, join the military and other ghastly practices. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别与法律
1.美国。美国政府、企业、媒体等,以及我的学生都在吹捧它的民主价值观的优点——它是所有国家中最自由的,考虑到移民人数有增无减,这似乎是真的!为了获得梦寐以求的绿卡,南半球的人们会付出什么呢?然而,这种例外论的修辞有不祥的阴暗面。自1945年以来,没有其他国家以美国军事机器的水平和强度进行侵略战争。事实上,在其200年的历史中,只有7年没有发生过战争。因此,没有哪位美国总统可以被认为是和平总统!使用炸弹从塔利班手中“解放阿富汗女孩”,或者从美国军方和中央情报局首先支持的独裁者手中解放伊拉克人民,这是非常令人不安的——在伊拉克,妇女有机会获得各种专业工作——因此,为“自由”而入侵的运动不可能在“妇女权利”的人道主义斗篷下执行。正如哲学家安吉拉·戴维斯(Angela Y. Davis)在公开演讲中所建议的那样,每当乔治·w·布什在演讲中鼓吹“自由(和民主)”时,用“资本主义”代替“自由”会做得更好——那时他的修辞就真的有意义了。不惜任何代价的例外主义。19世纪帝国时期的门罗主义向东蔓延,席卷了整个世界,尤其是在冷战结束后,它在亚洲和非洲的激烈表达。到目前为止,我们对这个自认为民主、坚决支持出口或热衷于在海外推行这种民主的帝国的全球帝国式表达进行了简要的了解。民主在这个民族国家里意味着什么,尤其是对所有的女性和有色人种来说?事实上,正如自由人弗雷德里克·道格拉斯(Frederick Douglass)所感叹的那样:7月4日对美国奴隶来说意味着什么?为了达到我们的目的,让我们记住困扰美利坚共和国的两个重要法律后果:一个是存在,另一个是缺席。众所周知,美国邦联是建立在两大暴力支柱上的:对土著人民的种族灭绝和对从另一个大陆捕获的人民的奴役。然而,它却在广泛传播“自由和民主”。请注意一个未被充分审视的法律事实:美国宪法第13修正案抓住了美国民主的矛盾本质:被奴役的人,契约人是自由的,但前提是他们不犯罪。修改。十三)!因此,1865年美国内战的结束并没有解放被奴役的黑人,而是开启了国家批准的奴隶制。这个州以如此热情的态度抓人并监禁他们,以至于到目前为止,美国是全世界监狱之国。它拥有世界上5%的人口,却关押着世界上25%的囚犯。不出所料,在每天230万的美国囚犯中,大多数是黑人,尽管黑人人口占总人口的12%,明显是少数!自从45年前尼克松政府宣传种族主义的禁毒战争以来,黑人女性被过度监禁的情况令人担忧,甚至超过了黑人男性,黑人女孩在幼儿园前到监狱的管道中被过度监管(Chesney-Lind, 2015;莫里斯,2016)。第13修正案的结果是,美国是世界上唯一一个使奴隶制合法化的国家!第二个法律事实与缺席有关:1982年,一项平等权利修正案(ERA)被否决,这要归功于一位保守派白人女性、反女权主义者菲利斯·施莱夫利(Phyllis Schlafly)的积极行动,她热情地支持(白人)女性继续做无薪家庭主妇的权利(并在2016年9月去世前支持唐纳德·特朗普竞选总统)。她对《性别平等法案》的恐惧是,基于性别权利的平等保护条款会以一种滑坡式的方式将权利扩展到性少数群体,然后他们就可以结婚、参军和其他可怕的行为。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hierarchical Femininities and Masculinities in Australia Based on Parenting and Employment: A Multidimensional, Multilevel, Relational and Intersectional Perspective Microfinance for Wives: Fresh Insights Obtained from a Study of Poor Rural Women in Pakistan The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on the Appraisal of Civic Virtue Performance Gender Studies in Communication Research: A Longitudinal Analysis of Scientific Papers Published in Spanish Journals Indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (Jcr) and the Scimago Journal Rank (Sjr) (1988–2017) The Consequences of Blurred Boundaries between Private and Public Spheres in Patriarchal Societies: Evidence from Druze Women in Israel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1