The Surprising Liberal Defense of the Traditional Family in the Enlightenment

John Witte
{"title":"The Surprising Liberal Defense of the Traditional Family in the Enlightenment","authors":"John Witte","doi":"10.1017/9781316882542.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis Article shows that many Enlightenment liberals defended traditional family values and warned against the dangers of sexual libertinism and marital breakdown. While they rejected many traditional teachings in their construction of modern liberalism, Enlightenment liberals held firmly to classical and Christian teachings that exclusive and enduring monogamous marriages are the best way to ensure paternal certainty and joint parental investment in children who are born vulnerable and dependent on their parents' mutual care. Stable marital households, furthermore, are the best way to ensure that men and women are treated with equal dignity and respect, and that husbands and wives, and parents and children, provide each other with mutual support, protection, and edification throughout their lifetimes. The positive law of the state must not only support the marital family but also outlaw polygamy, fornication, adultery, and \"light divorce\" that violate the other spouse's natural rights as well as desertion, abuse, neglect, and disinheritance that violate their children's natural rights to support, protection, and education from their parents. This argument about the natural norms and laws of sex, marriage, and family life, was adumbrated by Aristotle, elaborated by Thomas Aquinas, and then extended by scores of later theologians, philosophers, and jurists. Many of the great architects of Western liberalism embraced these traditional teachings and defended them with arguments from nature, reason, custom, fairness, prudence, utility, pragmatism, and common sense. Their arguments echoed loudly in sundry Anglo-American common law texts, statutes, and cases until the twentieth century, and they remain instructive even for our post-modern polities and families.INTRODUCTIONFor better or worse, we are in the midst of a family law revolution that is upending millennium-long laws and customs of the West.1 A century ago, American law defined marriage as an exclusive and enduring monogamous union between a man and a woman with the freedom and capacity to marry each other.2 Marriage was considered to be the heart of the family and household, and it was designed for the mutual love and support of husband and wife, their mutual protection from sexual temptation, and their mutual procreation, nurture, and education of children. The law required that engagements be formal and that marriages be contracted with parental consent and witnesses and with a suitable waiting period, sometimes accompanied by the publication of banns. It required marriage licenses and registration and solemnization before civil authorities, religious authorities, or both. It prohibited marriages between couples with various blood and kin ties identified in the Mosaic and Roman law. It discouraged marriage where one party was impotent or had a contagious disease that precluded sex and procreation or physically endangered the other spouse. Couples who sought to divorce had to publicize their intentions, to petition a court, to show adequate cause or fault, and to make provision for the dependent spouse and children. Criminal laws outlawed fornication, adultery, prostitution, sodomy, polygamy, incest, contraception, abortion, and other perceived sexual offenses. Tort laws held third parties liable for seduction, enticement, loss of consortium, or alienation of the affections of one's spouse. Many of these legal rules had millennium-long roots in the civil law, canon law, and common law traditions of the West, with several rules going deeper still into ancient Greek and Roman laws.3Today, much of this traditional family law has fallen or been pushed aside in favor of new cultural and constitutional norms of sexual liberty, privacy, and autonomy.4 Marriage is viewed increasingly at law and at large today as a private contract to be formed, maintained, and dissolved as the parties see fit. Requirements of parental consent and witnesses to the formation of engagement and marital contracts have largely disappeared. …","PeriodicalId":247478,"journal":{"name":"Church, State, and Family","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Church, State, and Family","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316882542.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis Article shows that many Enlightenment liberals defended traditional family values and warned against the dangers of sexual libertinism and marital breakdown. While they rejected many traditional teachings in their construction of modern liberalism, Enlightenment liberals held firmly to classical and Christian teachings that exclusive and enduring monogamous marriages are the best way to ensure paternal certainty and joint parental investment in children who are born vulnerable and dependent on their parents' mutual care. Stable marital households, furthermore, are the best way to ensure that men and women are treated with equal dignity and respect, and that husbands and wives, and parents and children, provide each other with mutual support, protection, and edification throughout their lifetimes. The positive law of the state must not only support the marital family but also outlaw polygamy, fornication, adultery, and "light divorce" that violate the other spouse's natural rights as well as desertion, abuse, neglect, and disinheritance that violate their children's natural rights to support, protection, and education from their parents. This argument about the natural norms and laws of sex, marriage, and family life, was adumbrated by Aristotle, elaborated by Thomas Aquinas, and then extended by scores of later theologians, philosophers, and jurists. Many of the great architects of Western liberalism embraced these traditional teachings and defended them with arguments from nature, reason, custom, fairness, prudence, utility, pragmatism, and common sense. Their arguments echoed loudly in sundry Anglo-American common law texts, statutes, and cases until the twentieth century, and they remain instructive even for our post-modern polities and families.INTRODUCTIONFor better or worse, we are in the midst of a family law revolution that is upending millennium-long laws and customs of the West.1 A century ago, American law defined marriage as an exclusive and enduring monogamous union between a man and a woman with the freedom and capacity to marry each other.2 Marriage was considered to be the heart of the family and household, and it was designed for the mutual love and support of husband and wife, their mutual protection from sexual temptation, and their mutual procreation, nurture, and education of children. The law required that engagements be formal and that marriages be contracted with parental consent and witnesses and with a suitable waiting period, sometimes accompanied by the publication of banns. It required marriage licenses and registration and solemnization before civil authorities, religious authorities, or both. It prohibited marriages between couples with various blood and kin ties identified in the Mosaic and Roman law. It discouraged marriage where one party was impotent or had a contagious disease that precluded sex and procreation or physically endangered the other spouse. Couples who sought to divorce had to publicize their intentions, to petition a court, to show adequate cause or fault, and to make provision for the dependent spouse and children. Criminal laws outlawed fornication, adultery, prostitution, sodomy, polygamy, incest, contraception, abortion, and other perceived sexual offenses. Tort laws held third parties liable for seduction, enticement, loss of consortium, or alienation of the affections of one's spouse. Many of these legal rules had millennium-long roots in the civil law, canon law, and common law traditions of the West, with several rules going deeper still into ancient Greek and Roman laws.3Today, much of this traditional family law has fallen or been pushed aside in favor of new cultural and constitutional norms of sexual liberty, privacy, and autonomy.4 Marriage is viewed increasingly at law and at large today as a private contract to be formed, maintained, and dissolved as the parties see fit. Requirements of parental consent and witnesses to the formation of engagement and marital contracts have largely disappeared. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
启蒙时代对传统家庭的惊人的自由主义辩护
【摘要】许多启蒙自由主义者捍卫传统的家庭价值观,警告性自由主义和婚姻破裂的危险。虽然他们在构建现代自由主义的过程中拒绝了许多传统教义,但启蒙自由主义者坚定地坚持古典和基督教的教义,即排他和持久的一夫一妻制婚姻是确保父亲确定性和父母共同投资的最佳方式,因为孩子天生脆弱,需要父母的共同照顾。此外,稳定的婚姻家庭是确保男女享有平等尊严和尊重的最佳途径,也是确保丈夫和妻子、父母和子女在一生中相互支持、保护和熏陶的最佳途径。国家的实在法不仅要支持婚姻家庭,而且要禁止侵犯配偶一方自然权利的一夫多妻、奸淫、通奸和“轻微离婚”,以及侵犯子女从父母那里获得支持、保护和教育的自然权利的遗弃、虐待、忽视和剥夺继承权。这种关于性、婚姻和家庭生活的自然规范和法则的争论,由亚里士多德提出,由托马斯·阿奎那详细阐述,然后由后来的许多神学家、哲学家和法学家加以扩展。许多西方自由主义的伟大缔造者都接受这些传统教义,并从自然、理性、习俗、公平、审慎、效用、实用主义和常识等方面为它们辩护。直到20世纪,他们的观点在各种英美普通法文本、法规和案例中都得到了强烈的回响,即使对我们后现代的政治和家庭来说,他们仍然具有指导意义。不管是好是坏,我们正处于一场家庭法的革命之中,这场革命正在颠覆西方长达千年的法律和习俗。一个世纪以前,美国法律将婚姻定义为一男一女之间排他性的、持久的一夫一妻制联盟,双方有结婚的自由和能力婚姻被认为是家庭和家庭的核心,它是为丈夫和妻子的相互爱和支持而设计的,他们相互保护免受性诱惑,他们共同生育、养育和教育孩子。法律要求订婚必须是正式的,婚姻必须得到父母的同意和见证人的见证,并有一段适当的等待期,有时还会公布结婚通知。它要求领取结婚证,在民政当局、宗教当局或两者同时进行登记和仪式。它禁止在摩西法和罗马法中有不同血缘和亲属关系的夫妇结婚。它不鼓励一方阳痿或患有无法进行性行为和生育的传染病或危及另一方身体健康的婚姻。寻求离婚的夫妇必须公开他们的意图,向法院请愿,证明充分的原因或过错,并为受抚养的配偶和子女作出准备。刑法禁止通奸、通奸、卖淫、鸡奸、一夫多妻、乱伦、避孕、堕胎和其他被认为是性犯罪的行为。侵权行为法要求第三方对引诱、引诱、丧失合作关系或对配偶感情的转移承担责任。这些法律规则中有许多在西方大陆法、教会法和普通法传统中有千年之久的根源,其中一些规则甚至更深入地进入了古希腊和罗马法。今天,许多传统的家庭法已经衰落,或者被推到一边,取而代之的是关于性自由、隐私和自主的新的文化和宪法规范如今,婚姻在法律上和总体上越来越被视为一种私人契约,可以按照双方认为合适的方式建立、维持和解除。在签订订婚和婚姻合同时,父母同意和见证人的要求已基本消失。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Suffer the Children? Marriage as an Office of Nature and a Sacrament of the Church The Domestic Market Why No Polygamy After Same-Sex Marriage Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1