Relationship between learning style and readiness for self-directed learning among nursing students at king Saud university, Saudi Arabia

Nesreen E. AbuAssi, Hanan A Alkorashy
{"title":"Relationship between learning style and readiness for self-directed learning among nursing students at king Saud university, Saudi Arabia","authors":"Nesreen E. AbuAssi, Hanan A Alkorashy","doi":"10.14419/IJANS.V5I2.5993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-directed learning and other prevalent learning styles are important aspects of nursing education because they help nurse educators to predict differences in learners’ needs, abilities, and interests. Moreover, nurse educators depend on these predictors when they choose the most suitable teaching strategies, which enable them to manage adult learners effectively. This study’s objective is to explore the relationship between learning styles and the willingness to adopt self-directed learning among nursing students in King Saud University (KSU). Using a cross-sectional descriptive correlational design, the study was conducted with 230 undergraduate nursing students (female and male) from the third to eighth academic levels at the College of Nursing at KSU, Saudi Arabia. Kolb’s learning styles inventory and the self-directed learning readiness scale were adopted to determine the effects of the self-directed learning approach. The study’s findings suggested that the majority of nursing students had a “Diverging” style of learning. The “self-control” subscale was used to determine the willingness for self-directed learning. It recorded the highest mean score compared to the subscales of “self-management” and “desire for learning.” However, no statistically significant association was found between learning styles and self-directed learning readiness. Additionally, the findings showed that the majority of the students who participated in this study had little interest in the self-directed learning approach. Thus, this study recommends that the nursing faculty needs to assess students for their preferred learning style and readiness for self-directed learning before and throughout the students’ enrollment in the college. Further, the nursing faculty should apply a variety of teaching methods to manage students’ learning needs effectively.","PeriodicalId":311537,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Nursing Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14419/IJANS.V5I2.5993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Self-directed learning and other prevalent learning styles are important aspects of nursing education because they help nurse educators to predict differences in learners’ needs, abilities, and interests. Moreover, nurse educators depend on these predictors when they choose the most suitable teaching strategies, which enable them to manage adult learners effectively. This study’s objective is to explore the relationship between learning styles and the willingness to adopt self-directed learning among nursing students in King Saud University (KSU). Using a cross-sectional descriptive correlational design, the study was conducted with 230 undergraduate nursing students (female and male) from the third to eighth academic levels at the College of Nursing at KSU, Saudi Arabia. Kolb’s learning styles inventory and the self-directed learning readiness scale were adopted to determine the effects of the self-directed learning approach. The study’s findings suggested that the majority of nursing students had a “Diverging” style of learning. The “self-control” subscale was used to determine the willingness for self-directed learning. It recorded the highest mean score compared to the subscales of “self-management” and “desire for learning.” However, no statistically significant association was found between learning styles and self-directed learning readiness. Additionally, the findings showed that the majority of the students who participated in this study had little interest in the self-directed learning approach. Thus, this study recommends that the nursing faculty needs to assess students for their preferred learning style and readiness for self-directed learning before and throughout the students’ enrollment in the college. Further, the nursing faculty should apply a variety of teaching methods to manage students’ learning needs effectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯沙特国王大学护理专业学生的学习风格与自主学习准备之间的关系
自主学习和其他流行的学习方式是护理教育的重要方面,因为它们有助于护士教育者预测学习者在需求、能力和兴趣方面的差异。此外,护士教育者在选择最合适的教学策略时也会依赖这些预测因素,从而有效地管理成人学员。本研究旨在探讨沙特国王大学(KSU)护理专业学生的学习风格与自主学习意愿之间的关系。本研究采用横截面描述性相关设计,对沙特阿拉伯沙特国王大学护理学院第三至第八学级的 230 名护理本科生(男女不限)进行了调查。研究采用了科尔布学习风格量表和自主学习准备量表来确定自主学习方法的效果。研究结果表明,大多数护理专业学生的学习风格为 "发散型"。自我控制 "分量表用于确定自主学习的意愿。与 "自我管理 "和 "学习欲望 "分量表相比,该分量表的平均得分最高。然而,学习风格与自主学习意愿之间并没有统计学意义上的关联。此外,研究结果表明,参与本研究的大多数学生对自主学习方法兴趣不大。因此,本研究建议,护理系教师需要在学生入学前和入学后对其偏好的学习风格和自主学习的准备情况进行评估。此外,护理系教师应采用多种教学方法,有效管理学生的学习需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nursing role in early detection of cardiac amyloidosis: a case report Challenges experienced by cancer patients receiving treatment at Oshakati oncology clinic, Oshana region, Namibia Factors associated with hemodialysis adequacy among end stage renal disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis in Rwanda Effect of stacked breathing exercise on reducing pulmonary infection and complications for patients with pleural effusion Nurses' compliance to patient and environmental safety guidelines in critical care units
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1