Indonesian Business Law: Legal Construction Between Bank-Creditor and Bank-Debitor in the Sub-Participation Contract

Krista Yitawati, A. Sulistiyono, Pujiono
{"title":"Indonesian Business Law: Legal Construction Between Bank-Creditor and Bank-Debitor in the Sub-Participation Contract","authors":"Krista Yitawati, A. Sulistiyono, Pujiono","doi":"10.2991/icglow-19.2019.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The papers aims to analyze the legal construction between bank-creditor and bank-debitor in the sub-participation contract, which apparently has not been well covered by the two legal fields in the event of a dispute, whereas the funds lent in the banking business are very important to immediately withdraw and run to extend credit to other sectors, or to support the liquidity. In the case of bankruptcy requests for the banks, Bank Indonesia is legally entitled to submit to the Commercial Court even not as a part of contract. However, the institution never once took a request to the Commercial Court. Even before Indonesian banking supervision adopted a multiple supervision of banking system. Bankruptcy Act 2004 does not legally entitled the right to the crditor directly, nor does Banking Act 1998 regulate the mechanism of creditor’ claim in the event of a sub-participation contract, other than complaining to Bank Indonesia to request being his “advocate(?)” to litigate to the court.","PeriodicalId":246077,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)","volume":"278 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icglow-19.2019.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The papers aims to analyze the legal construction between bank-creditor and bank-debitor in the sub-participation contract, which apparently has not been well covered by the two legal fields in the event of a dispute, whereas the funds lent in the banking business are very important to immediately withdraw and run to extend credit to other sectors, or to support the liquidity. In the case of bankruptcy requests for the banks, Bank Indonesia is legally entitled to submit to the Commercial Court even not as a part of contract. However, the institution never once took a request to the Commercial Court. Even before Indonesian banking supervision adopted a multiple supervision of banking system. Bankruptcy Act 2004 does not legally entitled the right to the crditor directly, nor does Banking Act 1998 regulate the mechanism of creditor’ claim in the event of a sub-participation contract, other than complaining to Bank Indonesia to request being his “advocate(?)” to litigate to the court.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼商法:分参与合同中银行债权人与银行债务人的法律建构
本文旨在分析分参与合同中银行-债权人和银行-债务人之间的法律建构,这两个法律领域在发生纠纷时显然没有很好地涵盖,而银行业务中借出的资金对于向其他部门提供信贷或支持流动性非常重要。在银行破产请求的情况下,印尼银行在法律上有权向商事法庭提交,即使不是作为合同的一部分。然而,该机构从未向商事法庭提出过请求。甚至在印尼银行监管采取多重监管银行体系之前。2004年的《破产法》并没有在法律上直接赋予债权人权利,1998年的《银行法》也没有规定债权人在次级参与合同的情况下的索赔机制,只是向印尼银行投诉,要求成为他的“辩护人”,向法院提起诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing “Legal Reality Model” Into Indonesia Corporate Criminal Liability The Urgency of Indonesia-Singapore’s Extradition Agreement in the Corruption Law Enforcement The Protection of Refugees Rights of Natural Disasters in Central Sulawesi Indonesia State-Owned Enterprises Restructuring Through Holding Company in Responding Bankruptcy in Subsidiaries State Policy’s Analysis in the Redistribution of Reformed Agrarian Lands From Forest Areas in Indonesia (Study of Presidential Regulation Number 86 Year 2018 Regarding Agrarian Reform)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1