Developing and validating a rating scale of speaking prosody ability for learners of Chinese as a second language

Sichang Gao, Mingwei Pan
{"title":"Developing and validating a rating scale of speaking prosody ability for learners of Chinese as a second language","authors":"Sichang Gao, Mingwei Pan","doi":"10.21437/speechprosody.2022-166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to develop a rating scale for evaluating speech prosody of learners of Chinese as a second language (CSL). The researchers first gathered 41 descriptors that were perceived as crucial indicators of prosody ability through interviewing ten CSL teachers, analyzing existing Chinese speaking proficiency scales from five universities in Mainland China. After rating the perception of the selected descriptors by ninety-four CSL teachers and consulting with four expert-teachers, 15 out of 41 descriptors remained to form a rating scale. Principal component analysis revealed that 15 descriptors with three different dimensions (prosodic strategic competence, fluency, prosodic naturalness) could meaningfully describe CSL prosody. Finally, using the 15 descriptors, 29 samples of CSL learners’ speech were evaluated by four raters. A combination of the structural equation modeling and the Many-Facets Rasch modeling confirmed that all the 15 descriptors fit well with the construct of prosody ability measured, demonstrating a good validity of this rating scale.","PeriodicalId":442842,"journal":{"name":"Speech Prosody 2022","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Prosody 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2022-166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to develop a rating scale for evaluating speech prosody of learners of Chinese as a second language (CSL). The researchers first gathered 41 descriptors that were perceived as crucial indicators of prosody ability through interviewing ten CSL teachers, analyzing existing Chinese speaking proficiency scales from five universities in Mainland China. After rating the perception of the selected descriptors by ninety-four CSL teachers and consulting with four expert-teachers, 15 out of 41 descriptors remained to form a rating scale. Principal component analysis revealed that 15 descriptors with three different dimensions (prosodic strategic competence, fluency, prosodic naturalness) could meaningfully describe CSL prosody. Finally, using the 15 descriptors, 29 samples of CSL learners’ speech were evaluated by four raters. A combination of the structural equation modeling and the Many-Facets Rasch modeling confirmed that all the 15 descriptors fit well with the construct of prosody ability measured, demonstrating a good validity of this rating scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发并验证了汉语作为第二语言学习者口语韵律能力评定量表
本研究旨在建立一套评价汉语学习者语音韵律的量表。研究人员首先通过对10名对外汉语教师的访谈,分析了中国大陆5所大学现有的汉语口语水平量表,收集了41个被认为是韵律能力关键指标的描述词。在对94名汉语教学教师对所选描述词的感知进行评分并咨询了4名专家教师后,41个描述词中有15个被保留下来形成评分量表。主成分分析表明,韵律策略能力、韵律流畅性、韵律自然度三个维度的15个描述词都能有效地描述汉语韵律。最后,利用这15个描述词,对29个汉语学习者的语音样本进行了4位评分者的评价。结构方程模型和多面Rasch模型相结合,证实了15个描述符都与韵律能力测量的结构吻合良好,证明了该量表的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conversational Correlates of Prosodic Entrainment in Youth with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder Individual variation in F0 marking of turn-taking in natural conversation in German and Swedish Contribution of voice quality to prediction of turn-taking events Production of Lexical Stress Matures Late in Typically Developing Children Can Prosody Transfer Embeddings be Used for Prosody Assessment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1