R&D Volatility Drivers

B. Lev, S. Radhakrishnan, J. Tong
{"title":"R&D Volatility Drivers","authors":"B. Lev, S. Radhakrishnan, J. Tong","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2763369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade, U.S. firms have used their large cash holdings to buyback shares and pay dividends, instead of investing in RD process-cost uncertainty using future cost of goods sold volatility; and technological disruption uncertainty using future special items volatility. Regarding product and process-cost uncertainties, we find that the association between R&D expenditures and subsequent volatilities of sales and cost of sales, is lower than our benchmark, tangible capital expenditures, generally considered a relatively safe investment. However, the association between R&D and future special items volatility is significantly higher than that of capital expenditures. Collectively, the findings show that the major uncertainty created by R&D is from technological disruptions and not product failures. By implication, firms should be using their large cash holdings to invest in radical R&D, which will enable them to be the leader in disruptive technology.","PeriodicalId":320323,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Research (Sub-Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Research (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2763369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Over the last decade, U.S. firms have used their large cash holdings to buyback shares and pay dividends, instead of investing in RD process-cost uncertainty using future cost of goods sold volatility; and technological disruption uncertainty using future special items volatility. Regarding product and process-cost uncertainties, we find that the association between R&D expenditures and subsequent volatilities of sales and cost of sales, is lower than our benchmark, tangible capital expenditures, generally considered a relatively safe investment. However, the association between R&D and future special items volatility is significantly higher than that of capital expenditures. Collectively, the findings show that the major uncertainty created by R&D is from technological disruptions and not product failures. By implication, firms should be using their large cash holdings to invest in radical R&D, which will enable them to be the leader in disruptive technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研发波动驱动因素
在过去的十年里,美国公司用他们持有的大量现金来回购股票和支付股息,而不是利用未来销售成本的波动性来投资研发过程成本的不确定性;以及技术破坏的不确定性,利用未来特殊物品的波动性。关于产品和过程成本的不确定性,我们发现研发支出与随后的销售波动性和销售成本之间的关联低于我们的基准,有形资本支出,通常被认为是相对安全的投资。然而,研发与未来特殊项目波动率之间的关联显著高于资本支出。总的来说,研究结果表明,研发造成的主要不确定性来自技术中断,而不是产品失败。言下之意,企业应该利用其大量现金储备投资于激进的研发,这将使它们成为颠覆性技术的领导者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can Environmental Policy Encourage Technical Change? Emissions Taxes and R&D Investment in Polluting Firms Three Decades of Research on Corporate Governance and R&D Investments: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda The Risk of Caution: Evidence from an R&D Experiment Bilateral R&D Productivity and Supply Chain Networks Notching R&D Investment with Corporate Income Tax Cuts in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1