{"title":"SIDONIO v CHANEL LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcac001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n H1 Trade marks — Opposition proceedings — Compound marks — Personal names — CHANEL’S GABRIELLE — Assessment of distinctive and dominant components — Conceptual similarity — Likelihood of confusion — Indirect confusion — “Wrong way round” confusion — Appeal to Appointed Person","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcac001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
H1 Trade marks — Opposition proceedings — Compound marks — Personal names — CHANEL’S GABRIELLE — Assessment of distinctive and dominant components — Conceptual similarity — Likelihood of confusion — Indirect confusion — “Wrong way round” confusion — Appeal to Appointed Person