Similar Minds Post Alike: Assessment of Suicide Risk Using a Hybrid Model

Lushi Chen, Abeer Aldayel, Nikolay Bogoychev, Tao Gong
{"title":"Similar Minds Post Alike: Assessment of Suicide Risk Using a Hybrid Model","authors":"Lushi Chen, Abeer Aldayel, Nikolay Bogoychev, Tao Gong","doi":"10.18653/v1/W19-3018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes our system submission for the CLPsych 2019 shared task B on suicide risk assessment. We approached the problem with three separate models: a behaviour model; a language model and a hybrid model. For the behavioral model approach, we model each user’s behaviour and thoughts with four groups of features: posting behaviour, sentiment, motivation, and content of the user’s posting. We use these features as an input in a support vector machine (SVM). For the language model approach, we trained a language model for each risk level using all the posts from the users as the training corpora. Then, we computed the perplexity of each user’s posts to determine how likely his/her posts were to belong to each risk level. Finally, we built a hybrid model that combines both the language model and the behavioral model, which demonstrates the best performance in detecting the suicide risk level.","PeriodicalId":201097,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-3018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper describes our system submission for the CLPsych 2019 shared task B on suicide risk assessment. We approached the problem with three separate models: a behaviour model; a language model and a hybrid model. For the behavioral model approach, we model each user’s behaviour and thoughts with four groups of features: posting behaviour, sentiment, motivation, and content of the user’s posting. We use these features as an input in a support vector machine (SVM). For the language model approach, we trained a language model for each risk level using all the posts from the users as the training corpora. Then, we computed the perplexity of each user’s posts to determine how likely his/her posts were to belong to each risk level. Finally, we built a hybrid model that combines both the language model and the behavioral model, which demonstrates the best performance in detecting the suicide risk level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
志趣相投:用混合模型评估自杀风险
本文描述了我们为CLPsych 2019共享任务B提交的关于自杀风险评估的系统。我们用三个独立的模型来解决这个问题:一个行为模型;语言模型和混合模型。对于行为模型方法,我们用四组特征对每个用户的行为和思想进行建模:发布行为、情绪、动机和用户发布的内容。我们使用这些特征作为支持向量机(SVM)的输入。对于语言模型方法,我们使用来自用户的所有帖子作为训练语料库,为每个风险级别训练一个语言模型。然后,我们计算每个用户帖子的困惑度,以确定他/她的帖子属于每个风险级别的可能性。最后,我们建立了一个结合语言模型和行为模型的混合模型,该模型在检测自杀风险水平方面表现出最好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Depressed Individuals Use Negative Self-Focused Language When Recalling Recent Interactions with Close Romantic Partners but Not Family or Friends Suicide Risk Assessment on Social Media: USI-UPF at the CLPsych 2019 Shared Task ConvSent at CLPsych 2019 Task A: Using Post-level Sentiment Features for Suicide Risk Prediction on Reddit Linguistic Analysis of Schizophrenia in Reddit Posts Predicting Suicide Risk from Online Postings in Reddit The UGent-IDLab submission to the CLPysch 2019 Shared Task A
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1