SERS: A Security-Related and Evidence-Based Ranking Scheme for Mobile Apps

N. Chowdhury, R. Raje
{"title":"SERS: A Security-Related and Evidence-Based Ranking Scheme for Mobile Apps","authors":"N. Chowdhury, R. Raje","doi":"10.1109/TPS-ISA48467.2019.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the number of smart mobile devices has rapidly increased worldwide. This explosion of continuously connected mobile devices has resulted in an exponential growth in the number of publically available mobile Apps. To facilitate the selection of mobile Apps, from various available choices, the App distribution platforms typically rank/recommend Apps based on average star ratings, the number of downloads, and associated reviews - the external aspect of an App. However, these ranking schemes typically tend to ignore critical internal aspects (e.g., security vulnerabilities) of the Apps. Such an omission of internal aspects is certainly not desirable, especially when many of the users do not possess the necessary skills to evaluate the internal aspects and choose an App based on the default ranking scheme which uses the external aspect. In this paper, we build upon our earlier efforts by focusing specifically on the security-related internal aspect of an App and its combination with the external aspect computed from the user reviews by identifying security-related comments.We use this combination to rank-order similar Apps. We evaluate our approach on publicly available Apps from the Google PlayStore and compare our ranking with prevalent ranking techniques such as the average star ratings. The experimental results indicate the effectiveness of our proposed approach.","PeriodicalId":129820,"journal":{"name":"2019 First IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 First IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS-ISA48467.2019.00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In recent years, the number of smart mobile devices has rapidly increased worldwide. This explosion of continuously connected mobile devices has resulted in an exponential growth in the number of publically available mobile Apps. To facilitate the selection of mobile Apps, from various available choices, the App distribution platforms typically rank/recommend Apps based on average star ratings, the number of downloads, and associated reviews - the external aspect of an App. However, these ranking schemes typically tend to ignore critical internal aspects (e.g., security vulnerabilities) of the Apps. Such an omission of internal aspects is certainly not desirable, especially when many of the users do not possess the necessary skills to evaluate the internal aspects and choose an App based on the default ranking scheme which uses the external aspect. In this paper, we build upon our earlier efforts by focusing specifically on the security-related internal aspect of an App and its combination with the external aspect computed from the user reviews by identifying security-related comments.We use this combination to rank-order similar Apps. We evaluate our approach on publicly available Apps from the Google PlayStore and compare our ranking with prevalent ranking techniques such as the average star ratings. The experimental results indicate the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SERS:一种与安全相关且基于证据的移动应用排名方案
近年来,智能移动设备的数量在全球范围内迅速增加。这种持续连接的移动设备的爆炸式增长导致了公共可用移动应用程序数量的指数级增长。为了方便手机应用的选择,应用分发平台通常根据平均星级、下载量和相关评论(应用的外部方面)对应用进行排名/推荐。然而,这些排名方案往往忽略了应用的关键内部方面(如安全漏洞)。这种内部方面的遗漏当然是不可取的,特别是当许多用户不具备必要的技能来评估内部方面,并根据使用外部方面的默认排名方案选择应用程序时。在本文中,我们在之前的努力的基础上,特别关注应用程序与安全相关的内部方面,以及通过识别与安全相关的评论从用户评论中计算出的外部方面。我们使用这个组合对类似的应用进行排序。我们对b谷歌PlayStore上的公开应用进行评估,并将我们的排名与流行的排名技术(如平均星级评级)进行比较。实验结果表明了该方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Performance Evaluation of CAN Encryption Title Page I Disincentivizing Double Spend Attacks Across Interoperable Blockchains User Acceptance of Usable Blockchain-Based Research Data Sharing System: An Extended TAM-Based Study Next Generation Smart Built Environments: The Fusion of Empathy, Privacy and Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1