Financing Community Resilience Before Disaster Strikes: Lessons From the United States

C. Kirschner, Akheil Singla, Angie Flick
{"title":"Financing Community Resilience Before Disaster Strikes: Lessons From the United States","authors":"C. Kirschner, Akheil Singla, Angie Flick","doi":"10.1093/ACREFORE/9780199389407.013.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As more and more of the population moves to areas prone to natural hazards, the costs of disasters are on the rise. Given that these events are an eventuality, governments must aid their communities in promoting disaster resilience, enabling their communities to reduce their susceptibility to natural hazards, and adapting to and recovering from disasters when they occur.\n The federal system in the United States divides these responsibilities among national, state, and local governments. Local and state governments are largely responsible for the direct provision of services to their communities, and the Stafford Act of 1988 provides that the federal government will pay at least 75% of all eligible expenses once a presidential major disaster declaration has been made. As a result, state and local governments have become largely reliant on transfers from the federal government to pay for disaster relief and recovery efforts. This system encourages state and local governments to ignore the risks they face and turn to the federal government for aid after a disaster.\n This system also seems to underemphasize an important mechanism that can bolster disaster resilience: financing the costs of disasters in advance through ex ante budgeting. Four tools for budgeting ex ante—intergovernmental grants, disaster stabilization funds, the municipal bond market, and hazard insurance—are described and examples of their use provided. Despite limited use by state governments, these tools provide governments the opportunity to build community resilience to disasters by budgeting ex ante for them.","PeriodicalId":300110,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ACREFORE/9780199389407.013.191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As more and more of the population moves to areas prone to natural hazards, the costs of disasters are on the rise. Given that these events are an eventuality, governments must aid their communities in promoting disaster resilience, enabling their communities to reduce their susceptibility to natural hazards, and adapting to and recovering from disasters when they occur. The federal system in the United States divides these responsibilities among national, state, and local governments. Local and state governments are largely responsible for the direct provision of services to their communities, and the Stafford Act of 1988 provides that the federal government will pay at least 75% of all eligible expenses once a presidential major disaster declaration has been made. As a result, state and local governments have become largely reliant on transfers from the federal government to pay for disaster relief and recovery efforts. This system encourages state and local governments to ignore the risks they face and turn to the federal government for aid after a disaster. This system also seems to underemphasize an important mechanism that can bolster disaster resilience: financing the costs of disasters in advance through ex ante budgeting. Four tools for budgeting ex ante—intergovernmental grants, disaster stabilization funds, the municipal bond market, and hazard insurance—are described and examples of their use provided. Despite limited use by state governments, these tools provide governments the opportunity to build community resilience to disasters by budgeting ex ante for them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在灾难发生前为社区恢复力提供资金:来自美国的经验教训
随着越来越多的人口迁移到容易发生自然灾害的地区,灾害的成本正在上升。鉴于这些事件是不可避免的,政府必须帮助他们的社区提高抗灾能力,使他们的社区能够减少对自然灾害的易感性,并在灾害发生时适应和恢复。美国的联邦制将这些责任划分为国家、州和地方政府。地方和州政府主要负责直接向社区提供服务,1988年的斯塔福德法案规定,一旦总统宣布重大灾难,联邦政府将支付至少75%的所有符合条件的费用。因此,州和地方政府在很大程度上依赖联邦政府的拨款来支付救灾和恢复工作。这种制度鼓励州和地方政府忽视他们面临的风险,在灾难发生后向联邦政府寻求援助。这一体系似乎也低估了一个能够增强灾害复原力的重要机制:通过事先预算提前为灾害成本提供资金。本文描述了政府间赠款、灾害稳定基金、市政债券市场和灾害保险等四种预算工具,并提供了使用实例。尽管州政府的使用有限,但这些工具为政府提供了通过事先编制预算来建立社区抗灾能力的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flood Risk Management: Analysis of Evacuation Process Hazards, Social Resilience, and Safer Futures Natural Hazards Governance in Chile Natural Hazards Governance in Democratic States With Developing Economies Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture Adaptation in Coastal Zones of Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1