A Rapid Review of Responsible AI frameworks: How to guide the development of ethical AI

Vita Santa Barletta, D. Caivano, Domenico Gigante, A. Ragone
{"title":"A Rapid Review of Responsible AI frameworks: How to guide the development of ethical AI","authors":"Vita Santa Barletta, D. Caivano, Domenico Gigante, A. Ragone","doi":"10.1145/3593434.3593478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last years, the raise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and its pervasiveness in our lives, has sparked a flourishing debate about the ethical principles that should lead its implementation and use in society. Driven by these concerns, we conduct a rapid review of several frameworks providing principles, guidelines, and/or tools to help practitioners in the development and deployment of Responsible AI (RAI) applications. We map each framework w.r.t. the different Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) phases discovering that most of these frameworks fall just in the Requirements Elicitation phase, leaving the other phases uncovered. Very few of these frameworks offer supporting tools for practitioners, and they are mainly provided by private companies. Our results reveal that there is not a \"catching-all\" framework supporting both technical and non-technical stakeholders in the implementation of real-world projects. Our findings highlight the lack of a comprehensive framework encompassing all RAI principles and all (SDLC) phases that could be navigated by users with different skill sets and with different goals.","PeriodicalId":178596,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3593434.3593478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last years, the raise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and its pervasiveness in our lives, has sparked a flourishing debate about the ethical principles that should lead its implementation and use in society. Driven by these concerns, we conduct a rapid review of several frameworks providing principles, guidelines, and/or tools to help practitioners in the development and deployment of Responsible AI (RAI) applications. We map each framework w.r.t. the different Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) phases discovering that most of these frameworks fall just in the Requirements Elicitation phase, leaving the other phases uncovered. Very few of these frameworks offer supporting tools for practitioners, and they are mainly provided by private companies. Our results reveal that there is not a "catching-all" framework supporting both technical and non-technical stakeholders in the implementation of real-world projects. Our findings highlight the lack of a comprehensive framework encompassing all RAI principles and all (SDLC) phases that could be navigated by users with different skill sets and with different goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速回顾负责任的人工智能框架:如何指导道德人工智能的发展
在过去的几年里,人工智能(AI)的兴起及其在我们生活中的普及,引发了一场关于在社会中实施和使用人工智能的伦理原则的激烈辩论。在这些关注点的驱动下,我们对几个框架进行了快速的审查,这些框架提供了原则、指导方针和/或工具,以帮助开发和部署负责任的AI (RAI)应用程序的从业者。我们将每个框架映射到不同的软件开发生命周期(SDLC)阶段,发现这些框架中的大多数只落在需求引出阶段,而没有发现其他阶段。这些框架很少为从业者提供支持工具,它们主要由私人公司提供。我们的结果表明,在现实世界项目的实施中,并没有一个“包揽一切”的框架来支持技术和非技术利益相关者。我们的发现强调了缺乏一个包含所有RAI原则和所有(SDLC)阶段的综合框架,这些框架可以由具有不同技能集和不同目标的用户导航。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classification-based Static Collection Selection for Java: Effectiveness and Adaptability Decentralised Autonomous Organisations for Public Procurement Analyzing the Resource Usage Overhead of Mobile App Development Frameworks Investigation of Security-related Commits in Android Apps Exploring the UK Cyber Skills Gap through a mapping of active job listings to the Cyber Security Body of Knowledge (CyBOK)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1