{"title":"A unifying approach to linear estimation via the partitioned algorithms, I: Continuous models","authors":"D. Lainiotis, K. Govindaraj","doi":"10.1109/CDC.1975.270586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the fundamental nature of the \"partitioned\" algorithms is demonstrated by showing that the \"partitioned\" algorithms serve as the basis of a unifying approach to linear filtering and smoothing. Specifically, generalized \"partitioned\" filtering and smoothing algorithms are given in terms of forward and backward-time differentiations that are theoretically interesting, possibly computationally attractive, as well as provide a unification of the previous major approaches to filtering and smoothing and clear delineation of their inter-relationships. In particular, the generalized \"partitioned\" filtering algorithms are shown to contain as special cases both the Kalman-Bucy filter as well as the Chandrasekhar algorithms. Furthermore, the generalized \"partitioned\" algorithms lead to important generalizations of the Chandrasekhar algorithms [5-7, 18- 19], as well as of the previous \"partitioned\" algorithms of the author [15-19]. These generalizations pertain to arbitrary initial conditions and time-varying models. It is also shown [20-22] that the generalized \"partitioned\" algorithm may also be given in terms of an imbedded generalized Chandrasekhar algorithm with the consequent possible computational advantages. Similarly, the generalized \"partitioned\" smoothing algorithm is shown to contain as special cases the major algorithms for smoothing such as those of Mayne and Fraser [9-10], Kailath and Frost [12], and Meditch [11], as well as the related ones of Zachrisson [13], and Biswas and Mahalanobis [14]. Finally, backwards smoothing algorithms for arbitrary boundary conditions are also obtained as a special case of the \"partitioned\" smoothing algorithms.","PeriodicalId":164707,"journal":{"name":"1975 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 14th Symposium on Adaptive Processes","volume":"38 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1975 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 14th Symposium on Adaptive Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1975.270586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
In this paper, the fundamental nature of the "partitioned" algorithms is demonstrated by showing that the "partitioned" algorithms serve as the basis of a unifying approach to linear filtering and smoothing. Specifically, generalized "partitioned" filtering and smoothing algorithms are given in terms of forward and backward-time differentiations that are theoretically interesting, possibly computationally attractive, as well as provide a unification of the previous major approaches to filtering and smoothing and clear delineation of their inter-relationships. In particular, the generalized "partitioned" filtering algorithms are shown to contain as special cases both the Kalman-Bucy filter as well as the Chandrasekhar algorithms. Furthermore, the generalized "partitioned" algorithms lead to important generalizations of the Chandrasekhar algorithms [5-7, 18- 19], as well as of the previous "partitioned" algorithms of the author [15-19]. These generalizations pertain to arbitrary initial conditions and time-varying models. It is also shown [20-22] that the generalized "partitioned" algorithm may also be given in terms of an imbedded generalized Chandrasekhar algorithm with the consequent possible computational advantages. Similarly, the generalized "partitioned" smoothing algorithm is shown to contain as special cases the major algorithms for smoothing such as those of Mayne and Fraser [9-10], Kailath and Frost [12], and Meditch [11], as well as the related ones of Zachrisson [13], and Biswas and Mahalanobis [14]. Finally, backwards smoothing algorithms for arbitrary boundary conditions are also obtained as a special case of the "partitioned" smoothing algorithms.
在本文中,通过显示“分区”算法作为统一线性滤波和平滑方法的基础,证明了“分区”算法的基本性质。具体来说,广义的“分区”滤波和平滑算法是根据向前和向后时间微分给出的,这在理论上是有趣的,可能在计算上是有吸引力的,并且提供了先前主要滤波和平滑方法的统一,并清楚地描述了它们之间的相互关系。特别地,广义的“分区”滤波算法被证明包含卡尔曼-布西滤波和钱德拉塞卡算法作为特殊情况。此外,广义的“分区”算法对Chandrasekhar算法[5- 7,18 -19]以及作者之前的“分区”算法[15-19]进行了重要的推广。这些概括适用于任意初始条件和时变模型。研究还表明[20-22],广义“分区”算法也可以用嵌入式广义钱德拉塞卡算法给出,由此可能具有计算优势。同样,广义的“分区”平滑算法作为特例包含了Mayne and Fraser[9-10]、Kailath and Frost[12]、Meditch[11]等主要的平滑算法,以及Zachrisson[13]、Biswas and Mahalanobis[14]等相关算法。最后,作为“分块”平滑算法的一种特例,给出了任意边界条件下的倒向平滑算法。