Comparison of ultra capacitors, hydraulic accumulators and batteries technologies to optimize hybrid vehicle ecoefficiency

J. Nzisabira, Yannick Louvigny, P. Duysinx
{"title":"Comparison of ultra capacitors, hydraulic accumulators and batteries technologies to optimize hybrid vehicle ecoefficiency","authors":"J. Nzisabira, Yannick Louvigny, P. Duysinx","doi":"10.1109/POWERENG.2009.4915261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of vehicle powertrain hybridization is to simultaneously improve the fuel consumption and environment pollutants impact (Eco-score) without decreasing the vehicle performances and other user satisfaction criteria. Based on a simulation model in ADVISOR, one can evaluate the performances, the emissions and then the Ecoscore and the User Satisfaction for different driving scenarios. To establish a rationale methodology for assessing the eco-efficiency character, we adopt a multidisciplinary optimization approach while minimizing / maximizing both Eco-score and User satisfaction objective functions. The proposed approach is then used to establish a comparison between HEV (hybrid electric vehicle) and HHV (hybrid hydraulic vehicle) configuration by highlighting the effect of different energy storage systems (batteries, ultra capacitors, hydraulic system), mechanical and electric components sizes upon the optimized HEV design. The selected application is the comparison of different mild parallel hybrid buses. Results show that the hybrid electric buses using ultra capacitors have almost the same performances as those using batteries, while the HHV technology can compete with HEV because of the hydraulic components low cost and recyclability if possibly using of water as motor/pump fluid.","PeriodicalId":246039,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/POWERENG.2009.4915261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The main objective of vehicle powertrain hybridization is to simultaneously improve the fuel consumption and environment pollutants impact (Eco-score) without decreasing the vehicle performances and other user satisfaction criteria. Based on a simulation model in ADVISOR, one can evaluate the performances, the emissions and then the Ecoscore and the User Satisfaction for different driving scenarios. To establish a rationale methodology for assessing the eco-efficiency character, we adopt a multidisciplinary optimization approach while minimizing / maximizing both Eco-score and User satisfaction objective functions. The proposed approach is then used to establish a comparison between HEV (hybrid electric vehicle) and HHV (hybrid hydraulic vehicle) configuration by highlighting the effect of different energy storage systems (batteries, ultra capacitors, hydraulic system), mechanical and electric components sizes upon the optimized HEV design. The selected application is the comparison of different mild parallel hybrid buses. Results show that the hybrid electric buses using ultra capacitors have almost the same performances as those using batteries, while the HHV technology can compete with HEV because of the hydraulic components low cost and recyclability if possibly using of water as motor/pump fluid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超级电容器、液压蓄能器和电池技术优化混合动力汽车生态效率的比较
汽车动力总成混合动力的主要目标是在不降低车辆性能和其他用户满意度标准的前提下,同时改善燃油消耗和环境污染物影响(Eco-score)。基于ADVISOR中的仿真模型,可以评估不同驾驶场景下的性能、排放、Ecoscore和用户满意度。为了建立评估生态效率特征的基本方法,我们采用多学科优化方法,同时最小化/最大化生态评分和用户满意度目标函数。然后,通过突出不同储能系统(电池、超级电容器、液压系统)、机械和电气元件尺寸对优化后的HEV设计的影响,利用所提出的方法建立HEV(混合动力汽车)和HHV(混合动力液压汽车)配置之间的比较。选择的应用是不同的轻度并联混合动力公交车的比较。结果表明,使用超级电容器的混合动力公交车的性能与使用电池的混合动力公交车基本相同,而HHV技术可以与HEV竞争,因为液压元件成本低,并且如果可能的话,可以将水用作电机/泵液。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An advanced three phase five level PWM rectifier Game based strategic bidding in pay as bid markets considering incomplete information and risk factor Novel flux weakening control algorithm for PMSMS Dynamics analysis of 220 V DC auxiliary system in power plant using different mathematical models Efficient system parameter selection to prevent oscillatory voltage instability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1