Comparison of Five Black-box Testing Methods for Object-Oriented Software

Kwang-Ik Seo, Eun-Man Choi
{"title":"Comparison of Five Black-box Testing Methods for Object-Oriented Software","authors":"Kwang-Ik Seo, Eun-Man Choi","doi":"10.1109/SERA.2006.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the size of software is getting huge, it is difficult for testers to check out all parts of source code in white-box style during integration testing or system testing period. Therefore functional test methods based on requirements information are frequently used in system level test. There have been a lot of test methods based on requirement specification. Each method has a different approach to specify software requirements. Test engineer should consider those various aspects of approaches and select proper black-box testing method to be applied. This paper presents the empirical comparison of major black-box testing methods and shows the different results by applying them to test a certain software system. The result shows that black-box testing methods check different levels of code construct. Test planer should consider the combination for the efficient test methods which combine extended use case test method and OCL test method","PeriodicalId":187207,"journal":{"name":"Fourth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA'06)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERA.2006.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

As the size of software is getting huge, it is difficult for testers to check out all parts of source code in white-box style during integration testing or system testing period. Therefore functional test methods based on requirements information are frequently used in system level test. There have been a lot of test methods based on requirement specification. Each method has a different approach to specify software requirements. Test engineer should consider those various aspects of approaches and select proper black-box testing method to be applied. This paper presents the empirical comparison of major black-box testing methods and shows the different results by applying them to test a certain software system. The result shows that black-box testing methods check different levels of code construct. Test planer should consider the combination for the efficient test methods which combine extended use case test method and OCL test method
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向对象软件五种黑盒测试方法的比较
随着软件规模的日益庞大,在集成测试或系统测试阶段,测试人员很难以白盒的方式检出源代码的所有部分。因此,基于需求信息的功能测试方法在系统级测试中被频繁使用。有很多基于需求规范的测试方法。每种方法都有不同的方法来指定软件需求。测试工程师应该考虑这些方法的各个方面,并选择合适的黑盒测试方法。本文对主要的黑盒测试方法进行了实证比较,并通过对某软件系统的测试,给出了不同的测试结果。结果表明,黑盒测试方法可以检查不同层次的代码结构。测试规划者应该考虑将扩展用例测试方法和OCL测试方法相结合的高效测试方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling of Situation-Middleware for TPO metadata based on Event-Condition-Action Rule Risk Management through Architecture Design Specification for Visual Requirements of Work-Centered Software Systems Mock Object Models for Test Driven Development Active Intelligent Service Offer System Addition Environment variable and Local variable
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1