Trust and independence aware decision fusion in distributed networks

Xinlei Wang, Jin-Hee Cho, Kevin S. Chan, Moonjeong Chang, A. Swami, P. Mohapatra
{"title":"Trust and independence aware decision fusion in distributed networks","authors":"Xinlei Wang, Jin-Hee Cho, Kevin S. Chan, Moonjeong Chang, A. Swami, P. Mohapatra","doi":"10.1109/PerComW.2013.6529545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In distributed network environments, decisions must often be made based on incomplete or uncertain evidence whose sources may be dependent. Properly fusing potentially unreliable and dependent information from multiple sources is critical to effective decision making. The Transferable Belief Model (TBM), an extension of Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST), is a well known information fusion framework that can cope with conflicting evidences. However, neither DST nor TBM deals with misbehaving data sources and dependence of fusion data, which are often observed in dynamic multi-hop network environments. In this work, we propose a decision fusion framework that considers multi-dimensional trust and independence of information using a provenance technique, to enhance fusion reliability. We consider three information trust dimensions: correctness, completeness, and timeliness. Our simulation results show that the proposed framework yields a higher correct decision ratio, compared with the baseline counterparts.","PeriodicalId":101502,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops)","volume":"848 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PerComW.2013.6529545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In distributed network environments, decisions must often be made based on incomplete or uncertain evidence whose sources may be dependent. Properly fusing potentially unreliable and dependent information from multiple sources is critical to effective decision making. The Transferable Belief Model (TBM), an extension of Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST), is a well known information fusion framework that can cope with conflicting evidences. However, neither DST nor TBM deals with misbehaving data sources and dependence of fusion data, which are often observed in dynamic multi-hop network environments. In this work, we propose a decision fusion framework that considers multi-dimensional trust and independence of information using a provenance technique, to enhance fusion reliability. We consider three information trust dimensions: correctness, completeness, and timeliness. Our simulation results show that the proposed framework yields a higher correct decision ratio, compared with the baseline counterparts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分布式网络中信任与独立感知决策融合
在分布式网络环境中,决策通常必须基于不完整或不确定的证据,这些证据的来源可能是依赖的。正确融合来自多个来源的可能不可靠和依赖的信息对于有效决策至关重要。可转移信念模型(TBM)是对Dempster-Shafer理论(DST)的扩展,是一个著名的信息融合框架,可以处理证据冲突。然而,DST和TBM都没有处理在动态多跳网络环境中经常观察到的不正常数据源和融合数据的依赖性。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个考虑多维信任和信息独立性的决策融合框架,使用一种来源技术来提高融合的可靠性。我们考虑三个信息信任维度:正确性、完整性和及时性。仿真结果表明,与基线框架相比,所提出的框架产生了更高的正确决策率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A reconfigurable distributed CEP middleware for diverse mobility scenarios TinyBox: Social, local, mobile content sharing PIggy-backed key exchange using online services (PIKE) Towards context-aware internet services with unselfish clients Recommendations-based location privacy control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1