Evaluation of the Processing Workload for Two Models of Communication Control in IP Networks

Kazuya Odagiri, G. Marco, Nao Tanoue, Rihito Yaegashi, M. Tadauchi, N. Ishii
{"title":"Evaluation of the Processing Workload for Two Models of Communication Control in IP Networks","authors":"Kazuya Odagiri, G. Marco, Nao Tanoue, Rihito Yaegashi, M. Tadauchi, N. Ishii","doi":"10.1109/AINA.2008.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In standard IP networks, the control of communication of individual connections is an important aspect of network management. Generally, we distinguish two models of communication control. One is based on the exploitation of standard mechanisms, such as IP filtering, port blocking, routing rules, deployed along the path between the client and the server. We refer to these mechanisms as infrastructure-based management model. On the other hand, the control can be carried out by controlling the client machines of every user. This new model is a client-side management model, and it has been realized in our previous work, by means of a dedicated framework we called DACS. Essentially, DACS distributes the control within the client machines. Therefore, also the network management processing workload is distributed. While in our previous work we investigated functions of DACS scheme and network services, here we are more concerned with analyzing the processing workload due to communication control demanded to the client machines in practical networks. In this regard, we evaluate DACS performance from the point of view of the processing load and demonstrate by some preliminary experiments that DACS framework is better than infrastructure-based management models. From this result, we conclude that, DACS outperforms existing solutions for the communication control problem, because it can control a whole local area network by distributed control of client machines, with an acceptable increase of the processing workload.","PeriodicalId":328651,"journal":{"name":"22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (aina 2008)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (aina 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2008.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In standard IP networks, the control of communication of individual connections is an important aspect of network management. Generally, we distinguish two models of communication control. One is based on the exploitation of standard mechanisms, such as IP filtering, port blocking, routing rules, deployed along the path between the client and the server. We refer to these mechanisms as infrastructure-based management model. On the other hand, the control can be carried out by controlling the client machines of every user. This new model is a client-side management model, and it has been realized in our previous work, by means of a dedicated framework we called DACS. Essentially, DACS distributes the control within the client machines. Therefore, also the network management processing workload is distributed. While in our previous work we investigated functions of DACS scheme and network services, here we are more concerned with analyzing the processing workload due to communication control demanded to the client machines in practical networks. In this regard, we evaluate DACS performance from the point of view of the processing load and demonstrate by some preliminary experiments that DACS framework is better than infrastructure-based management models. From this result, we conclude that, DACS outperforms existing solutions for the communication control problem, because it can control a whole local area network by distributed control of client machines, with an acceptable increase of the processing workload.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IP网络中两种通信控制模式的处理工作量评估
在标准IP网络中,对单个连接的通信控制是网络管理的一个重要方面。一般来说,我们区分两种通信控制模型。一种是基于利用标准机制,如IP过滤、端口阻塞、路由规则,沿着客户端和服务器之间的路径部署。我们将这些机制称为基于基础设施的管理模型。另一方面,可以通过控制每个用户的客户机来实现控制。这个新模型是一个客户端管理模型,它已经在我们之前的工作中通过我们称为DACS的专用框架实现了。实质上,DACS在客户机机器中分配控制。因此,网络管理处理的工作负载也是分布式的。在我们之前的工作中,我们研究了DACS方案和网络服务的功能,而在这里,我们更关心的是分析实际网络中由于客户端机器需要通信控制而产生的处理工作量。在这方面,我们从处理负载的角度评估DACS性能,并通过一些初步实验证明DACS框架优于基于基础设施的管理模型。从这个结果,我们得出结论,DACS在通信控制问题上优于现有的解决方案,因为它可以通过分布式控制客户端机器来控制整个局域网,而处理工作量的增加是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STAMP: Towards A Scalable Topology Announcement and Management Protocol Analysis of Packet Relaying Models and Incentive Strategies in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks with Game Theory Extending Always Best Connected Paradigm for Voice Communications in Next Generation Wireless Network Maintaining Packet Order in Reservation-Based Shared-Memory Optical Packet Switch Near Optimal Broadcasting in Optimal Triple Loop Graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1