Estimating the Return on Investment of Defect Taxonomy Supported System Testing in Industrial Projects

M. Felderer, Armin Beer
{"title":"Estimating the Return on Investment of Defect Taxonomy Supported System Testing in Industrial Projects","authors":"M. Felderer, Armin Beer","doi":"10.1109/SEAA.2012.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defect taxonomies collect and organize the domain knowledge and project experience of experts and are a valuable instrument of system testing for several reasons. They provide systematic backup for the design of tests, support decisions for the allocation of testing resources and provide a suitable basis for measuring the product and test quality. In this paper, we present a method of system testing based on defect taxonomies and an appropriate estimation procedure for its return on investment depending on several parameters like the average test design time or the number of test cycles and experience values of a test organization. The estimated return on investment provides decision support whether to apply defect taxonomy supported system testing for a specific product or not. We develop the estimation procedure in the context of an industrial project from a public health insurance institution where the return on investment was positive after the first test cycle. From the experience of this project we extract guidelines and heuristics for precise estimation and interpretation of the return on investment of defect taxonomy supported system testing in the context of other projects.","PeriodicalId":298734,"journal":{"name":"2012 38th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications","volume":"62 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 38th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2012.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Defect taxonomies collect and organize the domain knowledge and project experience of experts and are a valuable instrument of system testing for several reasons. They provide systematic backup for the design of tests, support decisions for the allocation of testing resources and provide a suitable basis for measuring the product and test quality. In this paper, we present a method of system testing based on defect taxonomies and an appropriate estimation procedure for its return on investment depending on several parameters like the average test design time or the number of test cycles and experience values of a test organization. The estimated return on investment provides decision support whether to apply defect taxonomy supported system testing for a specific product or not. We develop the estimation procedure in the context of an industrial project from a public health insurance institution where the return on investment was positive after the first test cycle. From the experience of this project we extract guidelines and heuristics for precise estimation and interpretation of the return on investment of defect taxonomy supported system testing in the context of other projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业项目中缺陷分类法支持系统测试的投资回报评估
缺陷分类法收集和组织专家的领域知识和项目经验,并且由于几个原因是系统测试的一个有价值的工具。它们为测试设计提供系统的支持,为测试资源的分配提供决策支持,并为测量产品和测试质量提供合适的依据。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于缺陷分类法的系统测试方法,并根据几个参数,如平均测试设计时间或测试周期的数量以及测试组织的经验值,对其投资回报进行了适当的估计过程。估计的投资回报为是否为特定产品应用缺陷分类法支持的系统测试提供决策支持。我们在公共健康保险机构的工业项目背景下开发估算程序,该项目在第一个测试周期后投资回报为正。从这个项目的经验中,我们提取了指导方针和启发式,用于在其他项目的环境中对缺陷分类法支持的系统测试的投资回报进行精确的估计和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TIRT: A Traceability Information Retrieval Tool for Software Product Lines Projects Differentiation in the Cloud: Methodology for Integrating Customer Values in Experience Design A Case Study on Measuring Process Quality: Lessons Learned Bee-Inpired Road Traffic Control as an Example of Swarm Intelligence in Cyber-Physical Systems Developers Motivation in Agile Teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1