Current Trends in Usability Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review

Freddy Paz, J. Pow-Sang
{"title":"Current Trends in Usability Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review","authors":"Freddy Paz, J. Pow-Sang","doi":"10.1109/ASEA.2014.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since usability is considered as a critical success factor for any software application, several evaluation methods have been developed. Nowadays, it is possible to find many proposals in the literature that address to evaluate usability issues. However, there is still discussion about what usability evaluation method is the most widely accepted by the scientific community. In this research, a systematic review was performed to identify the evaluation methods that have been more employed over the last three years in order to assess the level of usability of a software application. From these results, it has been possible to establish clear evidence about the current trends in this field. A total of 274 usability studies have allowed to reach useful information for scholars in this area.","PeriodicalId":320279,"journal":{"name":"2014 7th International Conference on Advanced Software Engineering and Its Applications","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 7th International Conference on Advanced Software Engineering and Its Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASEA.2014.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Since usability is considered as a critical success factor for any software application, several evaluation methods have been developed. Nowadays, it is possible to find many proposals in the literature that address to evaluate usability issues. However, there is still discussion about what usability evaluation method is the most widely accepted by the scientific community. In this research, a systematic review was performed to identify the evaluation methods that have been more employed over the last three years in order to assess the level of usability of a software application. From these results, it has been possible to establish clear evidence about the current trends in this field. A total of 274 usability studies have allowed to reach useful information for scholars in this area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可用性评估方法的发展趋势:系统回顾
由于可用性被认为是任何软件应用程序成功的关键因素,因此已经开发了几种评估方法。现在,可以在文献中找到许多关于评估可用性问题的建议。然而,究竟哪一种可用性评估方法是最被科学界广泛接受的,仍然存在着争论。在这项研究中,为了评估软件应用程序的可用性水平,进行了系统的审查,以确定在过去三年中被更多地使用的评估方法。从这些结果中,有可能确定关于这一领域当前趋势的明确证据。共有274项可用性研究为这一领域的学者提供了有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Construction for Balanced Boolean Function with Maximum Algebraic Immunity The Effect of Database System Application to Alleviate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Cost Estimation of Simulation Models for the Effectiveness Estimation of Simulation-Based Acquisition A Survey on Security Models, Techniques, and Tools for the Internet of Things Model for the Effectiveness Estimation of Simulation-Based Acquisition by Considering the Value of Modeling and Simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1