The state of database forensic research

W. Hauger, M. Olivier
{"title":"The state of database forensic research","authors":"W. Hauger, M. Olivier","doi":"10.1109/ISSA.2015.7335071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A sentiment that is quite often encountered in database forensic research material is the scarcity of scientific research in this vital area of digital forensics. Databases have been around for many years in the digital space and have moved from being exclusively used in specialised applications of big corporations to becoming a means to an end in even the simplest end-user applications. Newer disciplines such as cloud forensics seem to be producing a far greater volume of new research material than database forensics. This paper firstly investigates the validity of the expressed sentiment. It also attempts to establish possible reasons for the apparent lack of research in this area. A survey was conducted of scientific research material that was published after an initial assessment was performed in 2009. The gathered database forensic material was compared to scientific material published in the same period in the cloud forensic discipline. The survey indicated that the speed of research into database forensics has increased since the 2009 paper. However the area of cloud forensics has produced twice the amount of new research in the same time period. The factors that made cloud forensics an attractive research area are either not applicable to database forensics or no longer play a significant role. This would explain the lesser interest in performing research in database forensics.","PeriodicalId":126848,"journal":{"name":"2015 Information Security for South Africa (ISSA)","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Information Security for South Africa (ISSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSA.2015.7335071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

A sentiment that is quite often encountered in database forensic research material is the scarcity of scientific research in this vital area of digital forensics. Databases have been around for many years in the digital space and have moved from being exclusively used in specialised applications of big corporations to becoming a means to an end in even the simplest end-user applications. Newer disciplines such as cloud forensics seem to be producing a far greater volume of new research material than database forensics. This paper firstly investigates the validity of the expressed sentiment. It also attempts to establish possible reasons for the apparent lack of research in this area. A survey was conducted of scientific research material that was published after an initial assessment was performed in 2009. The gathered database forensic material was compared to scientific material published in the same period in the cloud forensic discipline. The survey indicated that the speed of research into database forensics has increased since the 2009 paper. However the area of cloud forensics has produced twice the amount of new research in the same time period. The factors that made cloud forensics an attractive research area are either not applicable to database forensics or no longer play a significant role. This would explain the lesser interest in performing research in database forensics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数据库取证研究现状
在数据库取证研究材料中经常遇到的一种观点是,在数字取证这一重要领域缺乏科学研究。数据库在数字领域已经存在了很多年,并且已经从专门用于大公司的专门应用程序转变为甚至在最简单的最终用户应用程序中成为一种手段。像云取证这样的新学科似乎比数据库取证产生了更多的新研究材料。本文首先考察了情感表达的效度。它还试图找出这一领域明显缺乏研究的可能原因。对2009年进行初步评估后发表的科学研究材料进行了调查。将收集到的数据库法医材料与同期在云法医学科中发表的科学材料进行比较。调查显示,自2009年那篇论文发表以来,对数据库取证的研究速度有所加快。然而,云取证领域在同一时期产生了两倍于此的新研究。使云取证成为一个有吸引力的研究领域的因素要么不适用于数据库取证,要么不再发挥重要作用。这就解释了为什么人们对数据库取证的研究兴趣不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards a digital forensic science Robustness of computational intelligent assurance models when assessing e-Commerce sites Self-sanitization of digital images using steganography Prerequisites for building a Computer Security Incident Response capability AFA-RFID: Physical layer authentication for passive RFID tags
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1