Protection for ‘Inferences Drawn’: A Comparison Between the General Data Protection Regulation and the California Consumer Privacy Act

Jordan M. Blanke
{"title":"Protection for ‘Inferences Drawn’: A Comparison Between the General Data Protection Regulation and the California Consumer Privacy Act","authors":"Jordan M. Blanke","doi":"10.54648/gplr2020080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inferences drawn from personal data have arguably become more dangerous to individual privacy than the vast collection and storage of the data itself. Recently there have been questions raised about whether the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has sufficient protection for these inferences. Probably not surprisingly, and learning from this possible shortcoming, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) specifically includes ‘inferences drawn’ as part of its definition of personal information. This article explores the widespread use of inferential data and compares the protection provided under the GDPR and the CCPA for such inferences.\nprivacy, data protection, inferences drawn, GDPR, CCPA","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Privacy Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Inferences drawn from personal data have arguably become more dangerous to individual privacy than the vast collection and storage of the data itself. Recently there have been questions raised about whether the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has sufficient protection for these inferences. Probably not surprisingly, and learning from this possible shortcoming, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) specifically includes ‘inferences drawn’ as part of its definition of personal information. This article explores the widespread use of inferential data and compares the protection provided under the GDPR and the CCPA for such inferences. privacy, data protection, inferences drawn, GDPR, CCPA
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对“推论”的保护:《通用数据保护条例》与《加州消费者隐私法》的比较
从个人数据中得出的推论可以说比大量收集和存储数据本身对个人隐私的危害更大。最近,人们对《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)是否对这些推论有足够的保护提出了质疑。加州消费者隐私法案(CCPA)从这一可能的缺陷中吸取教训,明确将“推断”作为其个人信息定义的一部分,这可能并不奇怪。本文探讨了推断数据的广泛使用,并比较了GDPR和CCPA对此类推断提供的保护。隐私,数据保护,推断,GDPR, CCPA
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Key Privacy Concepts in the EU and Canada The Personal Data Under the GDPR: Concept, Elements, and Boundaries News: APAC Privacy News Collection of Personal Information in Canadian Law Case Note: Strengthening the Role of Google? Recent Developments in the Right to Be Forgotten Case Law of the CJEU (TU and RE v. Google LLC, C-460/20)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1