Neoliberalleşme Bağlamında Sosyal Hizmet Alanında Bürokratikleşen Bilimsel Bilgi Üretimi: Yüksek Lisans Araştırmalarının İncelenmesi

Canan Kınıkoğlu, Caner Özdemir
{"title":"Neoliberalleşme Bağlamında Sosyal Hizmet Alanında Bürokratikleşen Bilimsel Bilgi Üretimi: Yüksek Lisans Araştırmalarının İncelenmesi","authors":"Canan Kınıkoğlu, Caner Özdemir","doi":"10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1094788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the knowledge production in social work through document analysis of the master’s theses, the primary step in professional and academic expertise, within the context of the neoliberalization of higher education in Turkey. Focusing on the period between 2005 and 2020, when the field of social work expanded in universities in Turkey, this paper poses the questions related to what social work master’s theses’ numbers, subjects, methods, and cases are, as well as how they are changing. To this end, a total of 674 open access master’s theses completed in the departments of social work, social services, and social work policies and management were examined through their abstracts and full texts. The number of masters’ thesis in social work skyrocketed after 2016, in line with the escalating number of post-graduate programs in social work in Turkey. The findings of the study reveal that this quantitative increase does not bring along a qualitative improvement in knowledge production in social work. The majority of the examined theses do not meet the basic methodological requirements of scientific knowledge, such as the correct definition and explanation of the population and sampling techniques of the study. These theses are further limited to the national scale since they mostly focus on the central regions of Turkey, such as Ankara and Istanbul, and they are differentiated only by the micro contexts and the different subject matters they study. Thus, on one hand, knowledge production in social work at the master’s level has expanded while moving away from the foundations of scientific knowledge. On the other hand, it has been bureaucratized through limited research scopes and standardized thesis writing processes, yielding the conclusion that it has transformed into a mass production process.","PeriodicalId":325470,"journal":{"name":"Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi / Journal of Social Policy Conferences","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi / Journal of Social Policy Conferences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1094788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the knowledge production in social work through document analysis of the master’s theses, the primary step in professional and academic expertise, within the context of the neoliberalization of higher education in Turkey. Focusing on the period between 2005 and 2020, when the field of social work expanded in universities in Turkey, this paper poses the questions related to what social work master’s theses’ numbers, subjects, methods, and cases are, as well as how they are changing. To this end, a total of 674 open access master’s theses completed in the departments of social work, social services, and social work policies and management were examined through their abstracts and full texts. The number of masters’ thesis in social work skyrocketed after 2016, in line with the escalating number of post-graduate programs in social work in Turkey. The findings of the study reveal that this quantitative increase does not bring along a qualitative improvement in knowledge production in social work. The majority of the examined theses do not meet the basic methodological requirements of scientific knowledge, such as the correct definition and explanation of the population and sampling techniques of the study. These theses are further limited to the national scale since they mostly focus on the central regions of Turkey, such as Ankara and Istanbul, and they are differentiated only by the micro contexts and the different subject matters they study. Thus, on one hand, knowledge production in social work at the master’s level has expanded while moving away from the foundations of scientific knowledge. On the other hand, it has been bureaucratized through limited research scopes and standardized thesis writing processes, yielding the conclusion that it has transformed into a mass production process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文在土耳其高等教育新自由主义化的背景下,通过对硕士论文(专业和学术专长的第一步)的文献分析,调查了社会工作中的知识生产。本文着眼于2005年至2020年期间,当社会工作领域在土耳其大学扩展时,提出了与社会工作硕士论文的数量,主题,方法和案例相关的问题,以及它们如何变化。为此,通过摘要和全文对社会工作系、社会服务系和社会工作政策与管理系完成的674篇开放获取硕士论文进行了审查。随着土耳其社会工作研究生课程的不断增加,社会工作硕士论文的数量在2016年之后急剧增加。研究结果显示,这种数量上的增加并没有带来社会工作知识生产的质的改善。大多数被审查的论文不符合科学知识的基本方法学要求,例如对研究的总体和抽样技术的正确定义和解释。这些论文进一步局限于国家范围,因为它们主要关注土耳其的中部地区,如安卡拉和伊斯坦布尔,它们仅通过微观背景和研究的不同主题来区分。因此,一方面,在远离科学知识基础的同时,硕士水平的社会工作知识生产已经扩大。另一方面,通过有限的研究范围和标准化的论文写作过程,它已经官僚化,从而得出结论,它已经转变为大规模生产过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dezavantajlı Grupların Beyaz Perdedeki Temsili: Aamir Khan Sineması Örneği Türkiye’de Sivil Toplumda Gönüllülük ve Psikolojik Sözleşme Çalışan Yoksulluğu Bağlamında Tüketim Alışkanlıkları ve Borçlanmanın Çalışma Hayatına Etkisi Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Organizational Movement of Theater Workers: A Case of Istanbul İş İlişkisinde Aileyi Koruyan İş Hukuku Düzenlemelerinin Sosyal Politika Açısından Değerlendirilmesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1