The Role of Judicial Councils as Authorities of the Judicial Community in Individual Regulation of Judicial Activities

E. Ryabtseva
{"title":"The Role of Judicial Councils as Authorities of the Judicial Community in Individual Regulation of Judicial Activities","authors":"E. Ryabtseva","doi":"10.18572/1812-3791-2021-2-36-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The activity of councils of judges in Russia is of a systemic nature, including various forms of individual influence on legal relations: opinions, resolutions, consulting on the prevention of corruption, compliance with ethical standards, prevention of conflicts of legal interests, and other reputational risks. The paper considers one of the activities of the councils of judges in the form of preparation of conclusions, which play a significant role in the formation of a uniform law enforcement practice in the process of individual regulation of judicial activity. The conclusions are of an explanatory nature and are taken into account by the qualification collegiums of judges when making decisions regarding judges and candidates for the position of judges. The essence of the conclusions of the councils of judges is substantiated as a kind of individual regulation of legal relations. The analysis of individual conclusions of the councils of judges made it possible to classify various methods of individual regulation in the process of law enforcement. It is concluded that the councils of judges are the subject of law enforcement, which, through individual regulation, provide certainty in the assessment of reputational risks, their prevention and suppression in the behavior of a judge through the interpretation of the principles and norms of law; overcoming conflicts in law; the use of optional, alternative, relatively specific, dispositive, etc. principles and norms of law; overcoming gaps in law; individualization of law in the form of opinions, decisions, consultation.","PeriodicalId":221748,"journal":{"name":"Russian judge","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian judge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3791-2021-2-36-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The activity of councils of judges in Russia is of a systemic nature, including various forms of individual influence on legal relations: opinions, resolutions, consulting on the prevention of corruption, compliance with ethical standards, prevention of conflicts of legal interests, and other reputational risks. The paper considers one of the activities of the councils of judges in the form of preparation of conclusions, which play a significant role in the formation of a uniform law enforcement practice in the process of individual regulation of judicial activity. The conclusions are of an explanatory nature and are taken into account by the qualification collegiums of judges when making decisions regarding judges and candidates for the position of judges. The essence of the conclusions of the councils of judges is substantiated as a kind of individual regulation of legal relations. The analysis of individual conclusions of the councils of judges made it possible to classify various methods of individual regulation in the process of law enforcement. It is concluded that the councils of judges are the subject of law enforcement, which, through individual regulation, provide certainty in the assessment of reputational risks, their prevention and suppression in the behavior of a judge through the interpretation of the principles and norms of law; overcoming conflicts in law; the use of optional, alternative, relatively specific, dispositive, etc. principles and norms of law; overcoming gaps in law; individualization of law in the form of opinions, decisions, consultation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
司法委员会作为司法界的权威机构在个别监管司法活动中的作用
俄罗斯法官委员会的活动是系统性的,包括个人对法律关系的各种形式的影响:意见、决议、关于防止腐败的咨询、遵守道德标准、防止法律利益冲突和其他声誉风险。本文认为法官委员会的活动之一是以编写结论的形式进行的,它在个别调节司法活动的过程中对形成统一的执法实践起着重要作用。这些结论是解释性的,法官资格合议庭在对法官和法官职位候选人作出决定时考虑到这些结论。法官评议结论的本质是一种对法律关系的个别规范。对法官委员会的个别结论进行分析,可以对执法过程中的各种个别管制方法进行分类。结论是,法官委员会是执法的主体,通过个别监管,为法官声誉风险的评估提供确定性,并通过对法律原则和规范的解释来预防和抑制法官的行为;克服法律冲突;采用任意性、替代性、相对具体、裁断性等法律原则和规范;克服法律上的差距;以意见、决定、协商等形式实现法律的个性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Participation of Volunteers in the Implementation of Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 10-FZ on Probation in the Russian Federation dated February 6, 2023 Environmental Migration: A Voluntary Relocation or a Forced Measure — Constitutional and Legal Aspects Special Rulings in Arbitral Proceedings: Certain Issues of Law Enforcement On the Need to Enhance the Procedural Role of Judicial Assistants Labor Function as a Labor-Law Element of Professional Activities of Judges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1