Polypharmacy: definition, risks, management

M. Khaitovych
{"title":"Polypharmacy: definition, risks, management","authors":"M. Khaitovych","doi":"10.22141/ogh.2.3.2021.240720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A search was performed in the Scopus, Web of Science, MedLine, The Cochrane Library databases. The term “polypharmacy”, in contrast to the term “polypragmasia”, does not always has a negative meaning and is often used to describe the simultaneous use of five or more drugs, and polypharmacy is considered intensive, when the patient takes 10 or more drugs at the same time. One of the main causes of polypharmacy is polymorbidity. Severe condition of the patient, self-medication and inappropriate recommendations can also cause polypharmacy, as well as some demographic factors (age, gender, level of education) and the level of the health care system development. Polypharmacy can be appropriate when the prescription of a large number of drugs is justified, and inappropriate (problematic) when the number of prescribed drugs is incorrect and/or unbalanced. Problematic polypharmacy is a manifestation of polypragmasia, with several drugs prescribed improperly that does not allow realizing the expected advantage of these drugs. The risk of harm from treatment outweighs the benefits due to drug interactions, adverse reactions, increasing economic burden of treatment. Problematic polypharmacy is especially dangerous for critically ill patients. The management of problematic polypharmacy should be based on its transition into an appropriate form. The combination of drugs is substantiated, which allows treating the patient effectively, safely and economically expediently through the prevention of drug interaction and adverse effects. Deprescribing of certain drugs can be used as a therapeutic intervention, it should be performed in each individual patient through the assessment of benefits and risks. Beers criteria, ARMOR, STOPP-START criteria are offered for prevention and correction of problematic polypharmacy in the elderly.","PeriodicalId":445461,"journal":{"name":"Oral and General Health","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and General Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22141/ogh.2.3.2021.240720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A search was performed in the Scopus, Web of Science, MedLine, The Cochrane Library databases. The term “polypharmacy”, in contrast to the term “polypragmasia”, does not always has a negative meaning and is often used to describe the simultaneous use of five or more drugs, and polypharmacy is considered intensive, when the patient takes 10 or more drugs at the same time. One of the main causes of polypharmacy is polymorbidity. Severe condition of the patient, self-medication and inappropriate recommendations can also cause polypharmacy, as well as some demographic factors (age, gender, level of education) and the level of the health care system development. Polypharmacy can be appropriate when the prescription of a large number of drugs is justified, and inappropriate (problematic) when the number of prescribed drugs is incorrect and/or unbalanced. Problematic polypharmacy is a manifestation of polypragmasia, with several drugs prescribed improperly that does not allow realizing the expected advantage of these drugs. The risk of harm from treatment outweighs the benefits due to drug interactions, adverse reactions, increasing economic burden of treatment. Problematic polypharmacy is especially dangerous for critically ill patients. The management of problematic polypharmacy should be based on its transition into an appropriate form. The combination of drugs is substantiated, which allows treating the patient effectively, safely and economically expediently through the prevention of drug interaction and adverse effects. Deprescribing of certain drugs can be used as a therapeutic intervention, it should be performed in each individual patient through the assessment of benefits and risks. Beers criteria, ARMOR, STOPP-START criteria are offered for prevention and correction of problematic polypharmacy in the elderly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多药制:定义、风险、管理
在Scopus, Web of Science, MedLine, the Cochrane Library数据库中进行了搜索。与“多语用症”(polypragmatic asia)相反,“多药”(polypharmacy)一词并不总是带有贬义,通常用于描述同时使用五种或五种以上药物,当患者同时服用10种或更多药物时,“多药”被认为是密集的。多重用药的主要原因之一是多重发病。病情严重的患者,自我用药和不适当的建议也可能导致多药,以及一些人口因素(年龄、性别、教育水平)和卫生保健系统发展水平。当大量药物的处方是合理的时,多药房是合适的,当处方药物数量不正确和/或不平衡时,多药房是不合适的(有问题的)。有问题的多重用药是多语用症的一种表现,几种药物的处方不当,无法实现这些药物的预期优势。由于药物相互作用、不良反应、增加治疗的经济负担,治疗的危害风险超过了益处。有问题的多重用药对危重病人尤其危险。对问题多药的管理应立足于其向适当形式的转变。药物组合得到证实,通过预防药物相互作用和不良反应,可以有效、安全、经济地治疗患者。某些药物的开处方可以作为一种治疗干预措施,应该通过评估获益和风险对每个患者进行。Beers标准,ARMOR, stop - start标准提供了预防和纠正老年人多重用药的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Threshold resummation of the rapidity distribution for Drell-Yan production at NNLO+NNLL
IF 5 2区 物理与天体物理Physical Review DPub Date : 2018-05-03 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.054018
Pulak Banerjee, Goutam Das, P. K. Dhani, V. Ravindran
Precision studies for Drell–Yan processes at NNLO
IF 4.4 2区 物理与天体物理The European Physical Journal CPub Date : 2021-04-06 DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09361-9
S. Alekhin, A. Kardos, S. Moch, Z. Tr'ocs'anyi
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
До 60-річчя професора Ігоря Миколайовича Матроса-Таранця Головні тренди розвитку світової стоматології на найближчі роки: програмні документи Світового стоматологічного конгресу в Австралії Міжнародна участь ГО «Асоціація стоматологів України» у Світовому стоматологічному конгресі в Австралії Українські лікарі-стоматологи у країнах Європейського Союзу Самоврядування у сфері охорони здоров’я: світовий досвід, історія запровадження в Україні, новий законопроєкт
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1