Factors Affecting Invasive Management after Unplanned Extubation in an Intensive Care Unit

A. L. Lee, C. Chung, Jeong Hoon Yang, K. Jeon, C. Park, G. Suh
{"title":"Factors Affecting Invasive Management after Unplanned Extubation in an Intensive Care Unit","authors":"A. L. Lee, C. Chung, Jeong Hoon Yang, K. Jeon, C. Park, G. Suh","doi":"10.4266/KJCCM.2015.30.3.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Unplanned extubation (UE) of patients requiring mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with poor outcomes for patients and organizations. This study was conducted to assess the clinical features of patients who experienced UE and to determine the risk factors affecting reintubation after UE in an ICU. Methods: Among all adult patients admitted to the ICU in our institution who required mechanical ventilation between January 2011 and December 2013, those in whom UE was noted were included in the study. Data were categorized according to noninvasive or invasive management after UE. Results: The rate of UE was 0.78% (the number of UEs per 100 days of mechanical ventilation). The incidence of self-extubation was 97.2%, while extubation was accidental in the remaining patients. Two cases of cardiac arrest combined with respiratory arrest after UE were noted. Of the 214 incidents, 54.7% required invasive management after UE. Long duration of mechanical ventilation (odds ratio [OR] 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-1.75; p = 0.000) and high ICU mortality (OR 4.39; 95% CI 1.33-14.50; p = 0.015) showed the most significant association with invasive management after UE. In multivariate analysis, younger age (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p = 0.005), medical patients (OR 4.36; 95% CI 1.95-9.75; p = 0.000), use of sedative medication (OR 4.95; 95% CI 1.97-12.41; p = 0.001), large amount of secretion (OR 2.66; 95% CI 1.01-7.02; p = 0.049), and low PaO2/FiO2 ratio (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p = 0.000) were independent risk factors of invasive management after UE. Conclusions: To prevent unfavorable clinical outcomes, close attention and proper ventilatory support are required for patients with risk factors who require invasive management after UE.","PeriodicalId":255255,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4266/KJCCM.2015.30.3.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Unplanned extubation (UE) of patients requiring mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with poor outcomes for patients and organizations. This study was conducted to assess the clinical features of patients who experienced UE and to determine the risk factors affecting reintubation after UE in an ICU. Methods: Among all adult patients admitted to the ICU in our institution who required mechanical ventilation between January 2011 and December 2013, those in whom UE was noted were included in the study. Data were categorized according to noninvasive or invasive management after UE. Results: The rate of UE was 0.78% (the number of UEs per 100 days of mechanical ventilation). The incidence of self-extubation was 97.2%, while extubation was accidental in the remaining patients. Two cases of cardiac arrest combined with respiratory arrest after UE were noted. Of the 214 incidents, 54.7% required invasive management after UE. Long duration of mechanical ventilation (odds ratio [OR] 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-1.75; p = 0.000) and high ICU mortality (OR 4.39; 95% CI 1.33-14.50; p = 0.015) showed the most significant association with invasive management after UE. In multivariate analysis, younger age (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p = 0.005), medical patients (OR 4.36; 95% CI 1.95-9.75; p = 0.000), use of sedative medication (OR 4.95; 95% CI 1.97-12.41; p = 0.001), large amount of secretion (OR 2.66; 95% CI 1.01-7.02; p = 0.049), and low PaO2/FiO2 ratio (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p = 0.000) were independent risk factors of invasive management after UE. Conclusions: To prevent unfavorable clinical outcomes, close attention and proper ventilatory support are required for patients with risk factors who require invasive management after UE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响重症监护室计划外拔管后侵入性管理的因素
背景:重症监护病房(ICU)需要机械通气的患者的计划外拔管(UE)与患者和组织的不良预后相关。本研究旨在评估UE患者的临床特征,并确定影响ICU UE术后再插管的危险因素。方法:选取2011年1月至2013年12月间我院ICU收治的所有需要机械通气的成年患者,将有UE的患者纳入研究。数据根据UE后的无创或有创处理进行分类。结果:UE率为0.78%(每100 d机械通气UE数)。自行拔管的发生率为97.2%,其余患者均为意外拔管。报告2例UE后心脏骤停合并呼吸骤停。在214例病例中,54.7%的患者在UE后需要有创治疗。机械通气持续时间长(优势比[OR] 1.52;95%置信区间[CI] 1.32-1.75;p = 0.000)和高ICU死亡率(OR 4.39;95% ci 1.33-14.50;p = 0.015)与UE后有创治疗的相关性最为显著。在多变量分析中,年龄越小(OR 0.96;95% ci 0.93-0.99;p = 0.005),内科患者(OR 4.36;95% ci 1.95-9.75;p = 0.000),使用镇静药物(OR 4.95;95% ci 1.97-12.41;p = 0.001),分泌量大(OR 2.66;95% ci 1.01-7.02;p = 0.049),低PaO2/FiO2比值(OR 0.99;95% ci 0.98-0.99;p = 0.000)是UE术后有创治疗的独立危险因素。结论:对于有危险因素且需要有创处理的患者,应密切关注并给予适当的通气支持,以预防不良的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delta Neutrophil Index as a Prognostic Marker in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Prevalence and Related Factors of Vitamin D Deficiency in Critically Ill Patients Changes in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Level in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock Surveillance of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae Carriage in a Japanese Intensive Care Unit: a Retrospective Analysis Successful Hysterectomy and Therapeutic Hypothermia Following Cardiac Arrest due to Postpartum Hemorrhage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1