Is there a J curve distribution for diastolic blood pressure?

C G Isles, D J Hole
{"title":"Is there a J curve distribution for diastolic blood pressure?","authors":"C G Isles,&nbsp;D J Hole","doi":"10.3109/10641969209036177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The question whether there is a level of diastolic pressure during treatment below which further reduction of pressure may be harmful rather than beneficial is of great interest. If, as the proponents of this hypothesis maintain, death from CHD among treated hypertensives becomes more rather than less common at very low diastolic pressure, this might explain at least in part why most primary prevention trials of hypertension have failed to show a reduction in CHD mortality. However, as the sceptics have pointed out, the evidence that drug induced lowering of blood pressure is harmful is not of the highest quality, and alternative explanations for excess cardiovascular mortality at low diastolic pressure exist. In the following review of this hotly contested debate it is concluded that both proponents and sceptics may be correct, but that the presence of a J curve should not divert attention from the main benefit of treating hypertension which is a reduction in the risk of fatal and non fatal stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":10339,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental hypertension. Part A, Theory and practice","volume":"14 1-2","pages":"139-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10641969209036177","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental hypertension. Part A, Theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10641969209036177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The question whether there is a level of diastolic pressure during treatment below which further reduction of pressure may be harmful rather than beneficial is of great interest. If, as the proponents of this hypothesis maintain, death from CHD among treated hypertensives becomes more rather than less common at very low diastolic pressure, this might explain at least in part why most primary prevention trials of hypertension have failed to show a reduction in CHD mortality. However, as the sceptics have pointed out, the evidence that drug induced lowering of blood pressure is harmful is not of the highest quality, and alternative explanations for excess cardiovascular mortality at low diastolic pressure exist. In the following review of this hotly contested debate it is concluded that both proponents and sceptics may be correct, but that the presence of a J curve should not divert attention from the main benefit of treating hypertension which is a reduction in the risk of fatal and non fatal stroke.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
舒张压是否有J曲线分布?
在治疗过程中是否存在一个舒张压水平,低于这个水平进一步降低压力可能有害而不是有益,这是一个非常有趣的问题。如果正如这一假说的支持者所坚持的那样,在接受治疗的高血压患者中,在舒张压非常低的情况下死于冠心病的情况更多而不是更少,这可能至少部分解释了为什么大多数高血压一级预防试验未能显示冠心病死亡率的降低。然而,正如怀疑者所指出的那样,药物诱导的降压有害的证据并不是最高质量的,对于低舒张压时心血管死亡率过高的其他解释是存在的。在接下来对这场激烈争论的回顾中,我们得出结论,无论是支持者还是怀疑者都可能是正确的,但J曲线的存在不应该转移人们对高血压治疗的主要好处的关注,即减少致命性和非致命性中风的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategies and difficulties in dietary intervention in myocardial infarction patients. Erythrocyte sodium-lithium countertransport in Chinese: its relationship to family history of hypertension. The ouabain-dependent Na(+)-K+ pump and the brain renin-angiotensin system. Effects of immobilization stress on renal sympathetic neurotransmission. ACTH hypertension in the rat: role of sodium chloride.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1