Aggregate Productivity Growth and Firm Dynamics in Korean Manufacturing 2007-2017

Kyoo il Kim, J. Park
{"title":"Aggregate Productivity Growth and Firm Dynamics in Korean Manufacturing 2007-2017","authors":"Kyoo il Kim, J. Park","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3578171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>English Abstract:</b> We study aggregate productivity growth of the Korean manufacturing industry for the 2007-2017 period. We find that the nature of such growth was quite different for two measures of productivity. For labor productivity, most of growth comes from productivity changes among surviving firms. On the other hand, for TFP, most of the productivity growth comes from that of new entrants in recent years. Our work illustrates the different nature of two productivity measures in terms of their growth paths. We also show interesting industry dynamics for both productivity measures, as exiting firms contributed positively to aggregate productivity growth with increasing trends, which suggests that the market had gradually eliminated firms of lower productivity. Using the dynamic Olley and Pakes (1996) decomposition, we also find that for both productivity measures, a substantial productivity growth after the 2008 global financial crisis was due to market share reallocations between firms, but this between-firm contribution has somewhat slowed or been decreasing since then. Our industry sector level study also shows that there has been fundamentally different heterogeneous productivity growth patterns and components across manufacturing sectors. <br><br>Finally, we find that the wage level also plays a role in moderating or as an accelerating factor for different productivity growth paths among surviving, entering, and exiting firms. We find that higher wage groups had disproportionately higher entry and exit rates, and that the contributions of these industry dynamics to aggregate productivity growth were largest for the highest wage group while the productivity growth from the between firm component was substantially higher for lower wage groups. Therefore, we find that not only a timely change in input and output, but also in the wage, is a necessary ingredient for the pace and magnitude of reallocation to be effective in aggregate productivity growth.","PeriodicalId":169574,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3578171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

English Abstract: We study aggregate productivity growth of the Korean manufacturing industry for the 2007-2017 period. We find that the nature of such growth was quite different for two measures of productivity. For labor productivity, most of growth comes from productivity changes among surviving firms. On the other hand, for TFP, most of the productivity growth comes from that of new entrants in recent years. Our work illustrates the different nature of two productivity measures in terms of their growth paths. We also show interesting industry dynamics for both productivity measures, as exiting firms contributed positively to aggregate productivity growth with increasing trends, which suggests that the market had gradually eliminated firms of lower productivity. Using the dynamic Olley and Pakes (1996) decomposition, we also find that for both productivity measures, a substantial productivity growth after the 2008 global financial crisis was due to market share reallocations between firms, but this between-firm contribution has somewhat slowed or been decreasing since then. Our industry sector level study also shows that there has been fundamentally different heterogeneous productivity growth patterns and components across manufacturing sectors.

Finally, we find that the wage level also plays a role in moderating or as an accelerating factor for different productivity growth paths among surviving, entering, and exiting firms. We find that higher wage groups had disproportionately higher entry and exit rates, and that the contributions of these industry dynamics to aggregate productivity growth were largest for the highest wage group while the productivity growth from the between firm component was substantially higher for lower wage groups. Therefore, we find that not only a timely change in input and output, but also in the wage, is a necessary ingredient for the pace and magnitude of reallocation to be effective in aggregate productivity growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2007-2017年韩国制造业总生产率增长与企业动态
摘要:本文研究了2007-2017年韩国制造业的总生产率增长。我们发现,对于两种生产率衡量标准而言,这种增长的性质是完全不同的。对于劳动生产率,大部分增长来自生存企业之间的生产率变化。另一方面,就全要素生产率而言,近年来大部分生产率增长来自于新进入者。我们的工作说明了两种生产率指标在其增长路径方面的不同性质。我们还展示了两种生产率指标的有趣的行业动态,因为退出的企业对总生产率增长的贡献呈上升趋势,这表明市场已经逐渐淘汰了生产率较低的企业。利用Olley和Pakes(1996)的动态分解,我们还发现,对于两种生产率指标,2008年全球金融危机后生产率的大幅增长是由于企业之间的市场份额再分配,但自那时以来,这种企业之间的贡献有所放缓或下降。我们的行业层面研究还表明,在制造业部门之间,存在着根本不同的异质性生产率增长模式和组成部分。最后,我们发现工资水平对生存企业、进入企业和退出企业的不同生产率增长路径也起到调节或加速的作用。我们发现,高工资群体的进入和退出率不成比例地高,并且这些行业动态对总生产率增长的贡献在最高工资群体中最大,而企业之间组成部分的生产率增长在低工资群体中明显更高。因此,我们发现,不仅投入和产出的及时变化,而且工资的及时变化,是再分配的速度和幅度在总生产率增长中有效的必要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Platform Oligopoly with Endogenous Homing: Implications for Free Entry and Mergers Biosimilar Entry and the Pricing of Biologic Drugs Few Notes on Inequality in Israel: The Causes Behind Inequality Self-Preferencing in Markets with Vertically-Integrated Gatekeeper Platforms Vertical Contracts and Entry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1