Reading California’s Power Grid: A Metonymic Methodology

S. Gerson
{"title":"Reading California’s Power Grid: A Metonymic Methodology","authors":"S. Gerson","doi":"10.1525/001c.35472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As climate change intensifies, the global imperative to minimize carbon emissions and move beyond oil deepens. Many visions for the future of energy imagine increased electrification as a solution to the transition away from fossil fuels that does not require major cultural change. In this imaginary, electricity acts as a bridge between the fossil-fueled twentieth century and technologically driven green energy futures. Not only does the vision of a green electrified future fail to address the unjust cultural and political power relations that surround energy systems, it also ignores the already disastrous impacts climate change has had on the US power grid. Examining the environmental entanglements of and the cultural imaginaries that shape electrification is necessary to imagining and enacting more just and transformative energy futures that do not use electrification as a means of prolonging the current extractive, colonial, and capitalist cultural approaches to energy. This essay takes as its starting point the tension between visions of green electric futures and the material reality of the grid. Focusing on California’s electricity grid, this essay analyzes electricity’s complicated web of power relations by triangulating three case studies that apply a metonymic methodology for close reading the region’s power grid. PG&E’s smart meter upgrades are the focus of the first case study. The second case study examines California’s recent electricity equipment–sparked superfires. Finally, the essay concludes with a third case study focused on PG&E’s public safety power shutoffs, the utility’s safety response intended to prevent additional fires. Ultimately, the three case studies, when juxtaposed, provide very different perspectives on the dominant narratives surrounding electrification. When triangulated, the case studies show how the imaginary of easily accessed limitless electricity, which fuels visions of increased electrification as a solution to climate change, relies on both an abstraction of the power grid and the continuation of unjust colonial practices.","PeriodicalId":235953,"journal":{"name":"Media+Environment","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media+Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.35472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As climate change intensifies, the global imperative to minimize carbon emissions and move beyond oil deepens. Many visions for the future of energy imagine increased electrification as a solution to the transition away from fossil fuels that does not require major cultural change. In this imaginary, electricity acts as a bridge between the fossil-fueled twentieth century and technologically driven green energy futures. Not only does the vision of a green electrified future fail to address the unjust cultural and political power relations that surround energy systems, it also ignores the already disastrous impacts climate change has had on the US power grid. Examining the environmental entanglements of and the cultural imaginaries that shape electrification is necessary to imagining and enacting more just and transformative energy futures that do not use electrification as a means of prolonging the current extractive, colonial, and capitalist cultural approaches to energy. This essay takes as its starting point the tension between visions of green electric futures and the material reality of the grid. Focusing on California’s electricity grid, this essay analyzes electricity’s complicated web of power relations by triangulating three case studies that apply a metonymic methodology for close reading the region’s power grid. PG&E’s smart meter upgrades are the focus of the first case study. The second case study examines California’s recent electricity equipment–sparked superfires. Finally, the essay concludes with a third case study focused on PG&E’s public safety power shutoffs, the utility’s safety response intended to prevent additional fires. Ultimately, the three case studies, when juxtaposed, provide very different perspectives on the dominant narratives surrounding electrification. When triangulated, the case studies show how the imaginary of easily accessed limitless electricity, which fuels visions of increased electrification as a solution to climate change, relies on both an abstraction of the power grid and the continuation of unjust colonial practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读加州电网:一种转喻方法
随着气候变化的加剧,全球减少碳排放、不再依赖石油的呼声日益高涨。许多关于能源未来的愿景都认为,增加电气化是一种不需要重大文化变革的解决方案,可以从化石燃料过渡到其他能源。在这个想象中,电力是连接化石燃料驱动的20世纪和技术驱动的绿色能源未来的桥梁。绿色电气化未来的愿景不仅未能解决围绕能源系统的不公正的文化和政治权力关系,而且还忽视了气候变化对美国电网已经造成的灾难性影响。检查的环境纠纷和文化虚电气化是必要的想象和制定更公正和变革能源期货,不使用电气化的延长目前的采掘,殖民,能源和资本主义文化的方法。本文以绿色电力未来的愿景与电网的物质现实之间的紧张关系为出发点。本文以加州的电网为重点,通过对三个案例进行三角分析,分析了电力复杂的权力关系网络,这些案例应用转喻方法来仔细阅读该地区的电网。PG&E的智能电表升级是第一个案例研究的重点。第二个案例研究考察了加州最近发生的由电力设备引发的超级火灾。最后,本文以第三个案例研究结束,重点关注PG&E的公共安全停电,公用事业公司的安全响应旨在防止更多的火灾。最终,这三个案例研究,当并置时,提供了围绕电气化的主导叙事非常不同的观点。通过三角分析,这些案例研究表明,容易获得无限电力的想象,助长了增加电气化作为气候变化解决方案的愿景,是如何依赖于对电网的抽象和不公正殖民实践的延续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Elements of Media Studies (Chinese Translation) Book Review: Game: Animals, Video Games, and Humanity. Tom Tyler. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2022. ISBN 1517910196. Queer, Toxic Soybeans and Estrogen Panic: Gendered Food Fearmongering “pack in. pack out. and pack your heels hunni”: Ecodrag and Ecoqueer Instagram “You Will Say, ‘Wow’”: Cinematic Glamping and Ecomasculine Crisis in (and around) The Revenant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1