The impact of unconditional basic income on the satisfaction of basic needs in the context of different socio-economic systems: advantages and limitations

Volodymyr Levin
{"title":"The impact of unconditional basic income on the satisfaction of basic needs in the context of different socio-economic systems: advantages and limitations","authors":"Volodymyr Levin","doi":"10.15407/etet2023.02.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the relationship between the introduction of unconditional basic income (UBI) and the satisfaction of needs according to the motivation theories of A. Maslow, D. McClelland, and others. UBI is a guaranteed minimum, which the state pays to every citizen, regardless of his contribution to the economy. It has been found that the idea of UBI has a long history, but its academic research began only in the second half of the 20th century due to the topic’s potential in reforming the social protection systems of developed countries. The purpose of the article is to assess the satisfaction of human needs as a result of the introduction of UBI in the context of various socio-economic systems (capitalism, socialism, socialism with Chinese characteristics, and communism). During the research, general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction were used. The content of motivation theories as a whole is highlighted and their evolution is briefly outlined. It is determined that the basic income should ensure the satisfaction of the fundamental needs of the first and second levels and contribute to increasing the level of the individual’s needs. It is shown that the implementation of the UBI in socio-economic systems built on the foundations of various ideologies is most likely to lead to positive consequences, despite the existing limitations. It is concluded that the main result of USI’s application will be the weakening of competition for resources and the formation of potential for the individual’s self-development, which would contribute to the growth of human capital. At the same time, it is emphasized that it is not impossible to solve, with the help of basic income the fundamental problems of inequality, which is characteristic of both developing and developed countries, and which causes competition. Through further research, it will be possible to develop more effective and balanced approaches to the use of basic income in economic systems, taking into account the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.","PeriodicalId":209799,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomìčna teorìâ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomìčna teorìâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2023.02.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article examines the relationship between the introduction of unconditional basic income (UBI) and the satisfaction of needs according to the motivation theories of A. Maslow, D. McClelland, and others. UBI is a guaranteed minimum, which the state pays to every citizen, regardless of his contribution to the economy. It has been found that the idea of UBI has a long history, but its academic research began only in the second half of the 20th century due to the topic’s potential in reforming the social protection systems of developed countries. The purpose of the article is to assess the satisfaction of human needs as a result of the introduction of UBI in the context of various socio-economic systems (capitalism, socialism, socialism with Chinese characteristics, and communism). During the research, general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction were used. The content of motivation theories as a whole is highlighted and their evolution is briefly outlined. It is determined that the basic income should ensure the satisfaction of the fundamental needs of the first and second levels and contribute to increasing the level of the individual’s needs. It is shown that the implementation of the UBI in socio-economic systems built on the foundations of various ideologies is most likely to lead to positive consequences, despite the existing limitations. It is concluded that the main result of USI’s application will be the weakening of competition for resources and the formation of potential for the individual’s self-development, which would contribute to the growth of human capital. At the same time, it is emphasized that it is not impossible to solve, with the help of basic income the fundamental problems of inequality, which is characteristic of both developing and developed countries, and which causes competition. Through further research, it will be possible to develop more effective and balanced approaches to the use of basic income in economic systems, taking into account the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不同社会经济制度下无条件基本收入对满足基本需要的影响:优势与局限
本文根据马斯洛(A. Maslow)、麦克利兰(D. McClelland)等人的动机理论,考察了无条件基本收入(unconditional basic income, UBI)的引入与需求满足之间的关系。全民基本收入是有保障的最低工资,国家支付给每个公民,无论他对经济的贡献如何。研究发现,全民基本收入的概念源远流长,但由于其在改革发达国家社会保障制度方面的潜力,其学术研究直到20世纪下半叶才开始。本文的目的是评估在不同社会经济制度(资本主义、社会主义、中国特色社会主义和共产主义)背景下引入全民基本收入对人类需求的满足。在研究过程中,采用了分析与综合、归纳与演绎的一般科学方法。强调了激励理论的整体内容,并简要概述了其演变过程。确定基本收入应确保满足第一级和第二级的基本需要,并有助于提高个人需要的水平。研究表明,尽管存在局限性,但在建立在各种意识形态基础上的社会经济体系中实施全民基本收入最有可能产生积极后果。研究结果表明,应用USI的主要结果是资源竞争的减弱和个人自我发展潜力的形成,有利于人力资本的增长。同时,它强调,在基本收入的帮助下,解决不平等的根本问题并非不可能,这是发展中国家和发达国家的特征,并导致竞争。通过进一步的研究,将有可能在实现可持续发展目标的同时,制定更有效和平衡的方法来在经济体系中使用基本收入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic pragmatism: political-economy essence, antipodes and imitation A classical ancient polis: the power-holding group and the features of exchange and appropriation Oligopoly control and unification of quantitative indexes to control different types of monopoly Strategic planning as a way of public administration Value-based work motivation: the East Asian experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1