A 4/3-Approximation Algorithm for Half-Integral Cycle Cut Instances of the TSP

Billy Jin, N. Klein, David P. Williamson
{"title":"A 4/3-Approximation Algorithm for Half-Integral Cycle Cut Instances of the TSP","authors":"Billy Jin, N. Klein, David P. Williamson","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2211.04639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A long-standing conjecture for the traveling salesman problem (TSP) states that the integrality gap of the standard linear programming relaxation of the TSP is at most 4/3. Despite significant efforts, the conjecture remains open. We consider the half-integral case, in which the LP has solution values in $\\{0, 1/2, 1\\}$. Such instances have been conjectured to be the most difficult instances for the overall four-thirds conjecture. Karlin, Klein, and Oveis Gharan, in a breakthrough result, were able to show that in the half-integral case, the integrality gap is at most 1.49993. This result led to the first significant progress on the overall conjecture in decades; the same authors showed the integrality gap is at most $1.5- 10^{-36}$ in the non-half-integral case. For the half-integral case, the current best-known ratio is 1.4983, a result by Gupta et al. With the improvements on the 3/2 bound remaining very incremental even in the half-integral case, we turn the question around and look for a large class of half-integral instances for which we can prove that the 4/3 conjecture is correct. The previous works on the half-integral case perform induction on a hierarchy of critical tight sets in the support graph of the LP solution, in which some of the sets correspond to\"cycle cuts\"and the others to\"degree cuts\". We show that if all the sets in the hierarchy correspond to cycle cuts, then we can find a distribution of tours whose expected cost is at most 4/3 times the value of the half-integral LP solution; sampling from the distribution gives us a randomized 4/3-approximation algorithm. We note that the known bad cases for the integrality gap have a gap of 4/3 and have a half-integral LP solution in which all the critical tight sets in the hierarchy are cycle cuts; thus our result is tight.","PeriodicalId":421894,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.04639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A long-standing conjecture for the traveling salesman problem (TSP) states that the integrality gap of the standard linear programming relaxation of the TSP is at most 4/3. Despite significant efforts, the conjecture remains open. We consider the half-integral case, in which the LP has solution values in $\{0, 1/2, 1\}$. Such instances have been conjectured to be the most difficult instances for the overall four-thirds conjecture. Karlin, Klein, and Oveis Gharan, in a breakthrough result, were able to show that in the half-integral case, the integrality gap is at most 1.49993. This result led to the first significant progress on the overall conjecture in decades; the same authors showed the integrality gap is at most $1.5- 10^{-36}$ in the non-half-integral case. For the half-integral case, the current best-known ratio is 1.4983, a result by Gupta et al. With the improvements on the 3/2 bound remaining very incremental even in the half-integral case, we turn the question around and look for a large class of half-integral instances for which we can prove that the 4/3 conjecture is correct. The previous works on the half-integral case perform induction on a hierarchy of critical tight sets in the support graph of the LP solution, in which some of the sets correspond to"cycle cuts"and the others to"degree cuts". We show that if all the sets in the hierarchy correspond to cycle cuts, then we can find a distribution of tours whose expected cost is at most 4/3 times the value of the half-integral LP solution; sampling from the distribution gives us a randomized 4/3-approximation algorithm. We note that the known bad cases for the integrality gap have a gap of 4/3 and have a half-integral LP solution in which all the critical tight sets in the hierarchy are cycle cuts; thus our result is tight.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TSP半积分环切实例的4/3逼近算法
关于旅行商问题(TSP)的一个长期存在的猜想指出,TSP的标准线性规划松弛的完整性间隙不超过4/3。尽管付出了巨大的努力,这个猜想仍然没有定论。我们考虑半积分情况,其中LP的解值在$\{0,1 /2,1\}$。这些例子被认为是整个四分之三猜想中最困难的例子。Karlin, Klein和Oveis Gharan在一个突破性的结果中,能够证明在半积分情况下,完整性差距最多为1.49993。这一结果导致了几十年来对整个猜想的第一次重大进展;同样的作者证明了在非半积分情况下,积分差不超过$1.5- 10^{-36}$。对于半积分情况,目前最著名的比率是由Gupta等人得出的1.4983。由于3/2界的改进在半积分情况下仍然是非常渐进的,我们把问题反过来,寻找一大类可以证明4/3猜想是正确的半积分实例。在半积分情况下,前人对LP解的支持图中的一组临界紧集进行了归纳,其中一些紧集对应于“循环切”,另一些紧集对应于“度切”。我们证明了如果层次结构中的所有集合都对应于循环切割,那么我们可以找到一个期望成本不超过半积分LP解值的4/3倍的旅行分布;从分布中抽样得到一个随机的4/3近似算法。我们注意到,已知的关于完整性间隙的坏情况有一个4/3的间隙,并且有一个半积分LP解,其中层次中的所有临界紧集都是循环切割;因此我们的结果是紧密的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information Complexity of Mixed-Integer Convex Optimization The Simultaneous Semi-random Model for TSP Constant-Competitiveness for Random Assignment Matroid Secretary Without Knowing the Matroid Optimizing Low Dimensional Functions over the Integers A linear time algorithm for linearizing quadratic and higher-order shortest path problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1