A Case Study of Onboarding in Software Teams: Tasks and Strategies

An Ju, Hitesh Sajnani, Scot Kelly, Kim Herzig
{"title":"A Case Study of Onboarding in Software Teams: Tasks and Strategies","authors":"An Ju, Hitesh Sajnani, Scot Kelly, Kim Herzig","doi":"10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developers frequently move into new teams or environments across software companies. Their onboarding experience is correlated with productivity, job satisfaction, and other short-term and long-term outcomes. The majority of the onboarding process comprises engineering tasks such as fixing bugs or implementing small features. Nevertheless, we do not have a systematic view of how tasks influence onboarding. In this paper, we present a case study of Microsoft, where we interviewed 32 developers moving into a new team and 15 engineering managers onboarding a new developer into their team – to understand and characterize developers' onboarding experience and expectations in relation to the tasks performed by them while onboarding. We present how tasks interact with new developers through three representative themes: learning, confidence building, and socialization. We also discuss three onboarding strategies as inferred from the interviews that managers commonly use unknowingly, and discuss their pros and cons and offer situational recommendations. Furthermore, we triangulate our interview findings with a developer survey (N = 189) and a manager survey (N = 37) and find that survey results suggest that our findings are representative and our recommendations are actionable. Practitioners could use our findings to improve their onboarding processes, while researchers could find new research directions from this study to advance the understanding of developer onboarding. Our research instruments and anonymous data are available at https://zenodo.org/record/4455937#.YCOQCs 0lFd.","PeriodicalId":305167,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Developers frequently move into new teams or environments across software companies. Their onboarding experience is correlated with productivity, job satisfaction, and other short-term and long-term outcomes. The majority of the onboarding process comprises engineering tasks such as fixing bugs or implementing small features. Nevertheless, we do not have a systematic view of how tasks influence onboarding. In this paper, we present a case study of Microsoft, where we interviewed 32 developers moving into a new team and 15 engineering managers onboarding a new developer into their team – to understand and characterize developers' onboarding experience and expectations in relation to the tasks performed by them while onboarding. We present how tasks interact with new developers through three representative themes: learning, confidence building, and socialization. We also discuss three onboarding strategies as inferred from the interviews that managers commonly use unknowingly, and discuss their pros and cons and offer situational recommendations. Furthermore, we triangulate our interview findings with a developer survey (N = 189) and a manager survey (N = 37) and find that survey results suggest that our findings are representative and our recommendations are actionable. Practitioners could use our findings to improve their onboarding processes, while researchers could find new research directions from this study to advance the understanding of developer onboarding. Our research instruments and anonymous data are available at https://zenodo.org/record/4455937#.YCOQCs 0lFd.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件团队的入职案例研究:任务和策略
开发人员经常跨软件公司进入新的团队或环境。他们的入职经历与生产力、工作满意度以及其他短期和长期结果相关。大多数入职过程包括工程任务,例如修复错误或实现小功能。然而,对于任务如何影响入职,我们并没有一个系统的观点。在这篇论文中,我们提出了一个微软的案例研究,我们采访了32名进入新团队的开发人员和15名将新开发人员纳入团队的工程经理,以了解和描述开发人员的入职经历以及与他们在入职时执行的任务相关的期望。我们通过三个代表性主题:学习、建立信心和社会化来展示任务如何与新开发人员互动。我们还讨论了从面试中推断出的三种入职策略,这些策略是管理者通常在不知情的情况下使用的,并讨论了它们的利弊,并提供了情境建议。此外,我们将访谈结果与开发者调查(N = 189)和管理者调查(N = 37)进行三角测量,发现调查结果表明我们的调查结果具有代表性,我们的建议具有可操作性。实践者可以使用我们的发现来改进他们的入职过程,而研究人员可以从这项研究中找到新的研究方向,以促进对开发人员入职的理解。我们的研究工具和匿名数据可在https://zenodo.org/record/4455937#.YCOQCs 0lFd上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MuDelta: Delta-Oriented Mutation Testing at Commit Time Verifying Determinism in Sequential Programs Data-Oriented Differential Testing of Object-Relational Mapping Systems IoT Bugs and Development Challenges Onboarding vs. Diversity, Productivity and Quality — Empirical Study of the OpenStack Ecosystem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1