Temporary urethral stent with perineal fixation for posterior urethral stenosis (preliminary results)

P. Kyzlasov, A. Mustafaev, D. Ostrovsky, A. Martov
{"title":"Temporary urethral stent with perineal fixation for posterior urethral stenosis (preliminary results)","authors":"P. Kyzlasov, A. Mustafaev, D. Ostrovsky, A. Martov","doi":"10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-2-80-85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Urethroplasty is the “gold standard” treatment of urethral stenosis. However, often in connection with old and senile age, as well as due to the presence of concomitant diseases, it is not possible to carry out urethroplasty due to its certain invasiveness. In such cases, one of the methods of treatment is the installation of a urethral stent. But this method has not found practical application due to the frequent migration of stent and the high frequency of its incrustation. The approach developed by us avoids stent migration.Purpose of the study. To evaluate the immediate results of the placement of a urethral stent with fixation through the perineum.Materials and methods. A total of 18 patients with urethral stenosis aged 68 to 84 years have been operated on since February 2019. Ten patients had stenosis of the urethrocystoneoanastomosis after radical prostatectomy, 6 patients had iatrogenic stenosis of the prostatic urethra, 1 patient had post-radiation stenosis of the bulbo-membranous urethra. All patients in the preoperative and postoperative periods underwent: IPSS-QoL questioning, uroflowmetry, bladder ultrasound with residual urine volume evaluation, urethroscopy, ascending and micturition urethrocystography. The first stage was an internal optical urethrotomy according to the standard technique. Then, a urethral stent was installed in the area of dissected stenosis. The second stage was an incision in the perineum, the urethra was isolated, and under optical control, through the perineum, the stent was fixed to the urethra with non-absorbable suture material. The stent was removed endoscopically after 6 months.Results. The median surgery duration averaged 45 minutes. Patients were discharged 2 to 3 days after surgery. The maximum observation period was 20 months. During the observation period, not a single case of stent migration was recorded. All patients showed a persistent increase in Qmax and no residual urine. Six patients had a stress component of urinary incontinence, 4 patients had total urinary incontinence. According to control urethrocystoscopy 6 months after stent removal, clinically insignificant urethral stenosis was noted in all patients. In all cases, moderate signs of stent encrustation were identified. Dysuric phenomena disturbed 5 patients, who were stopped by rectal suppositories with NSAIDs, as well as taking herbal uroseptics. The data from the IPPS-QoL questionnaires confirm the positive effect of the treatment.Conclusions. Temporary placement of a urethral stent for urethral stenosis is an effective minimally invasive treatment. The technique of fixation through the perineum allows preventing migration in all cases. This approach to treatment significantly improves the quality of life of patients who were contraindicated for urethroplasty for one reason or another. However, the technique requires longer observation and analysis.","PeriodicalId":345779,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Urologii","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Urologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-2-80-85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Urethroplasty is the “gold standard” treatment of urethral stenosis. However, often in connection with old and senile age, as well as due to the presence of concomitant diseases, it is not possible to carry out urethroplasty due to its certain invasiveness. In such cases, one of the methods of treatment is the installation of a urethral stent. But this method has not found practical application due to the frequent migration of stent and the high frequency of its incrustation. The approach developed by us avoids stent migration.Purpose of the study. To evaluate the immediate results of the placement of a urethral stent with fixation through the perineum.Materials and methods. A total of 18 patients with urethral stenosis aged 68 to 84 years have been operated on since February 2019. Ten patients had stenosis of the urethrocystoneoanastomosis after radical prostatectomy, 6 patients had iatrogenic stenosis of the prostatic urethra, 1 patient had post-radiation stenosis of the bulbo-membranous urethra. All patients in the preoperative and postoperative periods underwent: IPSS-QoL questioning, uroflowmetry, bladder ultrasound with residual urine volume evaluation, urethroscopy, ascending and micturition urethrocystography. The first stage was an internal optical urethrotomy according to the standard technique. Then, a urethral stent was installed in the area of dissected stenosis. The second stage was an incision in the perineum, the urethra was isolated, and under optical control, through the perineum, the stent was fixed to the urethra with non-absorbable suture material. The stent was removed endoscopically after 6 months.Results. The median surgery duration averaged 45 minutes. Patients were discharged 2 to 3 days after surgery. The maximum observation period was 20 months. During the observation period, not a single case of stent migration was recorded. All patients showed a persistent increase in Qmax and no residual urine. Six patients had a stress component of urinary incontinence, 4 patients had total urinary incontinence. According to control urethrocystoscopy 6 months after stent removal, clinically insignificant urethral stenosis was noted in all patients. In all cases, moderate signs of stent encrustation were identified. Dysuric phenomena disturbed 5 patients, who were stopped by rectal suppositories with NSAIDs, as well as taking herbal uroseptics. The data from the IPPS-QoL questionnaires confirm the positive effect of the treatment.Conclusions. Temporary placement of a urethral stent for urethral stenosis is an effective minimally invasive treatment. The technique of fixation through the perineum allows preventing migration in all cases. This approach to treatment significantly improves the quality of life of patients who were contraindicated for urethroplasty for one reason or another. However, the technique requires longer observation and analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
会阴固定临时尿道支架治疗后尿道狭窄(初步结果)
介绍。尿道成形术是治疗尿道狭窄的“金标准”。然而,通常与老年和老年有关,以及由于存在伴随疾病,由于其一定的侵入性,不可能进行尿道成形术。在这种情况下,治疗方法之一是安装尿道支架。但由于支架移位频繁,结皮频率高,该方法尚未得到实际应用。我们开发的方法避免了支架的迁移。研究目的:目的:评价经会阴固定尿道支架的即刻效果。材料和方法。2019年2月以来,共收治18例68 ~ 84岁尿道狭窄患者。根治性前列腺切除术后尿道结石吻合口狭窄10例,医源性前列腺尿道狭窄6例,放射后球膜性尿道狭窄1例。所有患者术前、术后均行:IPSS-QoL询问、尿流量测定、膀胱超声伴残尿量评估、尿道镜检查、升尿尿尿道造影术。第一阶段是按照标准技术进行内光学尿道切开术。然后在解剖狭窄区放置尿道支架。第二阶段为会阴切口,隔离尿道,在光学控制下,通过会阴,用不可吸收的缝合材料将支架固定在尿道上。6个月后,内镜下取出支架。平均手术时间为45分钟。术后2 ~ 3天出院。最长观察期为20个月。观察期间未发生一例支架移位。所有患者均表现为Qmax持续升高,无尿残。应激性尿失禁6例,完全性尿失禁4例。支架取出后6个月对照尿道镜检查,所有患者均发现临床上不明显的尿道狭窄。在所有病例中,均发现中度支架结痂迹象。5例患者出现排尿困难现象,经直肠栓剂加非甾体抗炎药停用,同时服用消毒药。IPPS-QoL问卷的数据证实了治疗的积极效果。临时放置尿道支架治疗尿道狭窄是一种有效的微创治疗方法。通过会阴的固定技术可以防止所有病例的移位。这种治疗方法显著提高了因某种原因禁忌行尿道成形术患者的生活质量。然而,这项技术需要更长的观察和分析时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic retropubic extraurethral adenomectomy The non-biological simulator with the ability to regulate the position of the kidney and bone landmarks: use for training puncture access in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy New coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Is there an impact on male reproductive health Opportunities for early detection of prostate cancer in young and middle-aged men Recent advances in transurethral resection of bladder tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1