Development and Initial Validation of the Perceived Scarcity Scale (PScS).

Maysa DeSousa, C. Reeve, A. Peterman
{"title":"Development and Initial Validation of the Perceived Scarcity Scale (PScS).","authors":"Maysa DeSousa, C. Reeve, A. Peterman","doi":"10.1002/smi.2908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though socioeconomic (SES) status partially explains the experience of stress and health outcomes, most research to date has relied on a small number of traditional indicators that fail to capture the full domain of socioeconomic factors. The recent reconceptualization of perceived scarcity is proposed as a subjective indicator of SES when attempting to predict both stress and health outcomes. Although a conceptualization of perceived scarcity has been advanced, a psychometrically sound scale is needed to assess the utility and scientific import of this concept. No such scale exists. Therefore, the current paper describes the development, psychometric properties, and initial validation of the Perceived Scarcity Scale (PScS). Four studies using traditional scale development processes were employed to develop (Studies 1 & 2) and provide an initial validation (Studies 3 & 4) for the PScS. Results support the existing model of perceived scarcity and indicate that the measure is valid. Moreover, the scale predicted concurrent perceived stress, as well as longitudinal ratings of perceived stress, global health, quality of life, and symptoms of depression and anxiety. The development of the new scale provides clinicians and researchers with a brief, validated measure that can assess the level of perceived scarcity individuals currently experience.","PeriodicalId":309674,"journal":{"name":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Though socioeconomic (SES) status partially explains the experience of stress and health outcomes, most research to date has relied on a small number of traditional indicators that fail to capture the full domain of socioeconomic factors. The recent reconceptualization of perceived scarcity is proposed as a subjective indicator of SES when attempting to predict both stress and health outcomes. Although a conceptualization of perceived scarcity has been advanced, a psychometrically sound scale is needed to assess the utility and scientific import of this concept. No such scale exists. Therefore, the current paper describes the development, psychometric properties, and initial validation of the Perceived Scarcity Scale (PScS). Four studies using traditional scale development processes were employed to develop (Studies 1 & 2) and provide an initial validation (Studies 3 & 4) for the PScS. Results support the existing model of perceived scarcity and indicate that the measure is valid. Moreover, the scale predicted concurrent perceived stress, as well as longitudinal ratings of perceived stress, global health, quality of life, and symptoms of depression and anxiety. The development of the new scale provides clinicians and researchers with a brief, validated measure that can assess the level of perceived scarcity individuals currently experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知稀缺性量表(PScS)的开发与初步验证。
虽然社会经济(SES)地位部分解释了压力和健康结果的经历,但迄今为止,大多数研究都依赖于少数传统指标,这些指标未能捕捉到社会经济因素的全部领域。最近对感知匮乏的重新概念化被提议作为SES的主观指标,当试图预测压力和健康结果时。虽然感知稀缺性的概念已经被提出,但需要一个心理测量学上合理的量表来评估这一概念的效用和科学意义。这样的规模并不存在。因此,本文描述了感知稀缺性量表(PScS)的发展、心理测量学特征和初步验证。使用传统规模开发流程的四项研究被用于开发(研究1和2)并为psc提供初步验证(研究3和4)。结果支持现有的感知稀缺性模型,表明该测度是有效的。此外,该量表预测了并发的感知压力,以及感知压力、整体健康、生活质量、抑郁和焦虑症状的纵向评分。新量表的开发为临床医生和研究人员提供了一个简短、有效的测量方法,可以评估个人目前所经历的感知稀缺性的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of alexithymia in suicide ideation among Taiwanese army military personnel: A serial mediation model investigating the effects of perceived stress and depression. Ageist attitudes and psychological distress in older adults: The moderating role of reflective functioning. Relationship between stigma and infertility-related stress among couples undergoing AID: The mediating role of communication patterns. Longitudinal mediation effect of hassles between neuroticism and dimensions of the tripartite model in college students. Unravelling the link between sleep and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1