How Do Default Privacy Settings on Social Media Apps Match People’s Actual Preferences?

Alper Alan, Zakwan Al-Arnaout, Ahmet Topçu, Chamseddine Zaki, A. Shdefat, E. Elbasi
{"title":"How Do Default Privacy Settings on Social Media Apps Match People’s Actual Preferences?","authors":"Alper Alan, Zakwan Al-Arnaout, Ahmet Topçu, Chamseddine Zaki, A. Shdefat, E. Elbasi","doi":"10.1109/ICECTA57148.2022.9990282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many social media apps provide privacy settings that allow users to control how their data should be processed and shared. Also, every account in these apps comes with default privacy settings that are often difficult to grasp and find, even for experts. Therefore, many users’ data may be utilized outside of their actual preferences. In this paper, we aim to explore how default privacy settings match people’s real preferences. To this end, we performed a UK-based online survey where we asked respondents about their preferences for some privacy settings of popular social media apps like Facebook and LinkedIn. The results show that the default privacy settings of many social media apps other than Google and Twitter do not reflect the true preferences of the majority of people. Even Google and Twitter were able to meet the preferences of only 61% and 54% of the respondents, respectively, which is far from a mere majority. Moreover, most of the respondents disapproved of data sharing with partners and personalized ads, which are common privacy settings in different apps and mostly enabled by default.","PeriodicalId":337798,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Electrical and Computing Technologies and Applications (ICECTA)","volume":"493 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Electrical and Computing Technologies and Applications (ICECTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECTA57148.2022.9990282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many social media apps provide privacy settings that allow users to control how their data should be processed and shared. Also, every account in these apps comes with default privacy settings that are often difficult to grasp and find, even for experts. Therefore, many users’ data may be utilized outside of their actual preferences. In this paper, we aim to explore how default privacy settings match people’s real preferences. To this end, we performed a UK-based online survey where we asked respondents about their preferences for some privacy settings of popular social media apps like Facebook and LinkedIn. The results show that the default privacy settings of many social media apps other than Google and Twitter do not reflect the true preferences of the majority of people. Even Google and Twitter were able to meet the preferences of only 61% and 54% of the respondents, respectively, which is far from a mere majority. Moreover, most of the respondents disapproved of data sharing with partners and personalized ads, which are common privacy settings in different apps and mostly enabled by default.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体应用的默认隐私设置如何与人们的实际偏好相匹配?
许多社交媒体应用程序提供隐私设置,允许用户控制如何处理和共享他们的数据。此外,这些应用程序中的每个账户都有默认的隐私设置,即使是专家也很难掌握和找到。因此,许多用户的数据可能会在他们的实际偏好之外被利用。在本文中,我们旨在探索默认隐私设置如何匹配人们的真实偏好。为此,我们在英国进行了一项在线调查,询问受访者对Facebook和LinkedIn等流行社交媒体应用程序的隐私设置的偏好。结果表明,除了谷歌和Twitter之外,许多社交媒体应用的默认隐私设置并不能反映大多数人的真实偏好。即使b谷歌和Twitter也只能分别满足61%和54%的受访者的偏好,这远远不是大多数。此外,大多数受访者不赞成与合作伙伴共享数据和个性化广告,这是不同应用中常见的隐私设置,大多数是默认启用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Centroid-Based Clustering Using Sentential Embedding Similarity Measure Moss-Based Biotechnological Air Purification Control System Studying the Effect of Face Masks in Identifying Speakers using LSTM Mental Stress Analysis using the Power Spectrum of fNIRS Signals RF LNA with Simultaneous Noise-Cancellation and Distortion-Cancellation for Wireless RF Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1