IMPLEMENTASI ALGORITMA NAÏVE BAYES CLASSIFIER DAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE PADA KLASIFIKASI SENTIMEN REVIEW LAYANAN TELEMEDICINE HALODOC

Reynalda Nabila Cikania
{"title":"IMPLEMENTASI ALGORITMA NAÏVE BAYES CLASSIFIER DAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE PADA KLASIFIKASI SENTIMEN REVIEW LAYANAN TELEMEDICINE HALODOC","authors":"Reynalda Nabila Cikania","doi":"10.34312/jjps.v2i2.11364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Halodoc is a telemedicine-based healthcare application that connects patients with health practitioners such as doctors, pharmacies, and laboratories. There are some comments from halodoc users, both positive and negative comments. This indicates the public's concern for the Halodoc application so it is necessary to analyze the sentiment or comments that appear on the Halodoc application service, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic in order for Halodoc application services to be better. The Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms are used to analyze the public sentiment of Halodoc's telemedicine service application users. The negative category sentiment classification result was 12.33%, while the positive category sentiment was 87.67% from 5,687 reviews which means that the positive review sentiment is more than the negative review sentiment. The accuracy performance of the Naive Bayes Classifier Algorithm resulted in an accuracy rate of 87.77% with an AUC value of 57.11% and a G-Mean of 40.08%, while svm algorithm with KERNEL RBF had an accuracy value of 86.1% with an AUC value of 60.149% and a G-Mean value of 49.311%. Based on the accuracy value of the model can be known SVM Kernel RBF model better than NBC on classifying the review of user sentiment of halodoc telemedicine service","PeriodicalId":315674,"journal":{"name":"Jambura Journal of Probability and Statistics","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jambura Journal of Probability and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34312/jjps.v2i2.11364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Halodoc is a telemedicine-based healthcare application that connects patients with health practitioners such as doctors, pharmacies, and laboratories. There are some comments from halodoc users, both positive and negative comments. This indicates the public's concern for the Halodoc application so it is necessary to analyze the sentiment or comments that appear on the Halodoc application service, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic in order for Halodoc application services to be better. The Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms are used to analyze the public sentiment of Halodoc's telemedicine service application users. The negative category sentiment classification result was 12.33%, while the positive category sentiment was 87.67% from 5,687 reviews which means that the positive review sentiment is more than the negative review sentiment. The accuracy performance of the Naive Bayes Classifier Algorithm resulted in an accuracy rate of 87.77% with an AUC value of 57.11% and a G-Mean of 40.08%, while svm algorithm with KERNEL RBF had an accuracy value of 86.1% with an AUC value of 60.149% and a G-Mean value of 49.311%. Based on the accuracy value of the model can be known SVM Kernel RBF model better than NBC on classifying the review of user sentiment of halodoc telemedicine service
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Halodoc是一个基于远程医疗的医疗保健应用程序,可将患者与医生、药房和实验室等医疗从业人员联系起来。有一些来自halodoc用户的评论,有正面的也有负面的。这表明公众对Halodoc应用的关注,因此有必要对Halodoc应用服务上出现的情绪或评论进行分析,特别是在COVID-19大流行期间,以便更好地提供Halodoc应用服务。利用Naïve贝叶斯分类器(NBC)和支持向量机(SVM)算法对Halodoc远程医疗服务应用用户的舆情进行分析。在5687篇评论中,负面类情绪分类结果为12.33%,而正面类情绪分类结果为87.67%,即正面评论情绪多于负面评论情绪。朴素贝叶斯分类器算法的准确率为87.77%,AUC值为57.11%,G-Mean为40.08%,而KERNEL RBF支持向量机算法的准确率为86.1%,AUC值为60.149%,G-Mean值为49.311%。基于该模型的准确率值可知SVM核RBF模型在对halodoc远程医疗服务的用户情感评论进行分类时优于NBC模型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine in Breast Cancer Problem Prediksi Jumlah Wisatawan Menggunakan Metode Random Forest, Single Exponential Smoothing dan Double Exponential Smoothing di Provinsi NTB Perbandingan Fuzzy Time Series Lee untuk Meramalkan Nilai Tukar Petani di Provinsi Gorontalo Implementasi Metode Runtun Waktu dalam Pemodelan Total Harga Alat Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penghambat Penyelesaian Studi Mahasiswa Program Studi Matematika Universitas Sulawesi Barat Menggunakan PLS-SEM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1