Learning styles and critical thinking skills of engineering students

M. M. Mohamad, A. Jamali, M. I. Mukhtar, L. Sern, A. Ahmad
{"title":"Learning styles and critical thinking skills of engineering students","authors":"M. M. Mohamad, A. Jamali, M. I. Mukhtar, L. Sern, A. Ahmad","doi":"10.1109/ICEED.2017.8251164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning styles reflect the behavior of students in determining preferences in learning situations. Students learn in various ways, such as by observing, listening, acting, reasoning, memorizing, and visualizing. Students also think in different ways, and critical thinking is a desirable competency in academic achievement. Critical thinking may be influenced by individual learning preferences. The learning styles and critical thinking skills of engineering students are factors that contribute to how they learn to achieve the learning outcome and to their readiness to enter the market. Existing technology and workplace trends require engineers who are equipped with critical thinking skills, such as solving problems, making decisions, and understanding of technical and engineering concepts for a successful future. Therefore, this paper discusses the analyses of the learning styles and critical thinking skills of 315 engineering students from Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. The Index of Learning Styles was adopted to measure the learning styles of the students, whereas a questionnaire for critical thinking was used to determine the critical thinking skills of the students in four dimensions: analysis, evaluation, induction, and deduction. Result shows that the engineering students are more inclined to be visual than verbal learners and they have received moderate critical thinking scores in each dimension. The result also indicates that no relationship exists between the learning styles and critical thinking skills of the engineering students.","PeriodicalId":119785,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2017.8251164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Learning styles reflect the behavior of students in determining preferences in learning situations. Students learn in various ways, such as by observing, listening, acting, reasoning, memorizing, and visualizing. Students also think in different ways, and critical thinking is a desirable competency in academic achievement. Critical thinking may be influenced by individual learning preferences. The learning styles and critical thinking skills of engineering students are factors that contribute to how they learn to achieve the learning outcome and to their readiness to enter the market. Existing technology and workplace trends require engineers who are equipped with critical thinking skills, such as solving problems, making decisions, and understanding of technical and engineering concepts for a successful future. Therefore, this paper discusses the analyses of the learning styles and critical thinking skills of 315 engineering students from Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. The Index of Learning Styles was adopted to measure the learning styles of the students, whereas a questionnaire for critical thinking was used to determine the critical thinking skills of the students in four dimensions: analysis, evaluation, induction, and deduction. Result shows that the engineering students are more inclined to be visual than verbal learners and they have received moderate critical thinking scores in each dimension. The result also indicates that no relationship exists between the learning styles and critical thinking skills of the engineering students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工科学生的学习风格和批判性思维能力
学习风格反映了学生在学习情境中决定偏好的行为。学生通过观察、倾听、表演、推理、记忆和想象等多种方式学习。学生们也以不同的方式思考,批判性思维是学术成就的理想能力。批判性思维可能受到个人学习偏好的影响。工科学生的学习风格和批判性思维能力是影响他们如何学习以取得学习成果和为进入市场做好准备的因素。现有的技术和工作场所趋势要求工程师具备批判性思维技能,如解决问题,做出决策,以及对技术和工程概念的理解,以实现成功的未来。因此,本文讨论了马来西亚敦候赛因大学315名工科学生的学习风格和批判性思维能力的分析。采用学习风格指数来衡量学生的学习风格,采用批判性思维问卷从分析、评价、归纳和演绎四个维度来衡量学生的批判性思维能力。结果表明,工科学生的视觉思维倾向高于语言学习者,且在各维度的批判性思维得分均处于中等水平。研究结果还表明,工科学生的学习风格与批判性思维能力之间不存在相关关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between multiple intelligence and career interest among the engineering students in vocational colleges LabVIEW as an effective tool for problem-based learning in undergraduate engineering education Understanding the secondary digital gap: Learning challenges and performance in college introductory programming courses Design and implementation of an online education and evaluation system Strategic implementation of outcome-based education system in Buein-Zahra Technical University of Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1