{"title":"The Thread of the Virtual Movement from Wölfflin to Lynn","authors":"Fabio Colonnese","doi":"10.14361/dak-2021-0208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract All buildings move under the effect of physical forces of the earth. It is unperceivable, but they move. Some of them are also designed to move to perform their functions. However, most of them look absolutely still. Nevertheless, architects, critics, and historians of architecture often borrowed terms from scientific disciplines to describe a building or parts of it as if it is actually moving. Since antiquity, artistic literature has been full of »dynamized« descriptions of artwork virtually set in motion to enhance the narrative quality of the communication, but in architecture this happens only from the end of the 18th century onward. Since the end of the 19th century, a sequence of scholars and architects Heinrich Wölfflin, Colin Rowe, Peter Eisenman, and Greg Lynn have been developing a series of analytical and design tools that were used to introduce (or to query) time and motion in architecture, whose different forms are here presented, classified, and discussed.","PeriodicalId":366028,"journal":{"name":"Dimensions. Journal of Architectural Knowledge","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensions. Journal of Architectural Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/dak-2021-0208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract All buildings move under the effect of physical forces of the earth. It is unperceivable, but they move. Some of them are also designed to move to perform their functions. However, most of them look absolutely still. Nevertheless, architects, critics, and historians of architecture often borrowed terms from scientific disciplines to describe a building or parts of it as if it is actually moving. Since antiquity, artistic literature has been full of »dynamized« descriptions of artwork virtually set in motion to enhance the narrative quality of the communication, but in architecture this happens only from the end of the 18th century onward. Since the end of the 19th century, a sequence of scholars and architects Heinrich Wölfflin, Colin Rowe, Peter Eisenman, and Greg Lynn have been developing a series of analytical and design tools that were used to introduce (or to query) time and motion in architecture, whose different forms are here presented, classified, and discussed.
所有建筑物都是在地球物理力的作用下移动的。这是无法察觉的,但它们在移动。其中一些还被设计为移动来执行它们的功能。然而,他们中的大多数看起来绝对静止。然而,建筑师、评论家和建筑历史学家经常从科学学科中借用术语来描述一座建筑物或它的一部分,就好像它真的在移动一样。自古以来,艺术文学就充满了对艺术作品的“动态化”描述,这种描述实际上是为了提高交流的叙事质量,但在建筑领域,这种情况只发生在18世纪末以后。自19世纪末以来,一系列学者和建筑师Heinrich Wölfflin, Colin Rowe, Peter Eisenman和Greg Lynn一直在开发一系列分析和设计工具,用于介绍(或查询)建筑中的时间和运动,其不同的形式在这里被呈现,分类和讨论。