Image quality assessment and color difference

Dogancan Temel, G. Al-Regib
{"title":"Image quality assessment and color difference","authors":"Dogancan Temel, G. Al-Regib","doi":"10.1109/GlobalSIP.2014.7032265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An average healthy person does not perceive the world in just black and white. Moreover, the perceived world is not composed of pixels and through vision humans perceive structures. However, the acquisition and display systems discretize the world. Therefore, we need to consider pixels, structures and colors to model the quality of experience. Quality assessment methods use the pixel-wise and structural metrics whereas color science approaches use the patch-based color differences. In this work, we combine these approaches by extending CIEDE2000 formula with perceptual color difference to assess image quality. We examine how perceptual color difference-based metric (PCDM) performs compared to PSNR, CIEDE2000, SSIM, MS-SSIM and CW-SSIM on the LIVE database. In terms of linear correlation, PCDM obtains compatible results under white noise (97.9%), Jpeg (95.9%) and Jp2k (95.6%) with an overall correlation of 92.7%. We also show that PCDM captures color-based artifacts that can not be captured by structure-based metrics.","PeriodicalId":362306,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GlobalSIP.2014.7032265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

An average healthy person does not perceive the world in just black and white. Moreover, the perceived world is not composed of pixels and through vision humans perceive structures. However, the acquisition and display systems discretize the world. Therefore, we need to consider pixels, structures and colors to model the quality of experience. Quality assessment methods use the pixel-wise and structural metrics whereas color science approaches use the patch-based color differences. In this work, we combine these approaches by extending CIEDE2000 formula with perceptual color difference to assess image quality. We examine how perceptual color difference-based metric (PCDM) performs compared to PSNR, CIEDE2000, SSIM, MS-SSIM and CW-SSIM on the LIVE database. In terms of linear correlation, PCDM obtains compatible results under white noise (97.9%), Jpeg (95.9%) and Jp2k (95.6%) with an overall correlation of 92.7%. We also show that PCDM captures color-based artifacts that can not be captured by structure-based metrics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图像质量评价和色差
一个普通健康的人并不认为世界只有黑与白。此外,感知到的世界不是由像素组成的,人类通过视觉感知结构。然而,采集和显示系统使世界离散化。因此,我们需要考虑像素、结构和颜色来模拟体验的质量。质量评估方法使用像素和结构度量,而色彩科学方法使用基于补丁的色差。在这项工作中,我们通过扩展CIEDE2000公式和感知色差来结合这些方法来评估图像质量。我们研究了基于感知色差的度量(PCDM)与LIVE数据库上的PSNR、CIEDE2000、SSIM、MS-SSIM和CW-SSIM相比的表现。线性相关性方面,PCDM在白噪声(97.9%)、Jpeg(95.9%)和Jp2k(95.6%)下得到兼容的结果,总体相关性为92.7%。我们还展示了PCDM捕获基于颜色的工件,这些工件不能被基于结构的度量捕获。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Competitive design of power allocation strategies for energy harvesting wireless communication systems Correction of over-exposure using color channel correlations Communications meets copula modeling: Non-standard dependence features in wireless fading channels Energy efficient and low complex wireless communication Feasibility of positive secrecy rate in wiretap interference channels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1